Page 20 of 55

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:54 pm
by Adsolution
Rulez wrote:
Rsandee wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Spanex wrote:The word "Private" mean anything to you?
Yeah, it's a soldier of the lowest military rank. Why?
Image
Rulez just want to have pun.
Yes, and Rulez should be punished for their insolence.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:55 pm
by Rulez
RayFan9876 wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Rsandee wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Spanex wrote:The word "Private" mean anything to you?
Yeah, it's a soldier of the lowest military rank. Why?
Image
Rulez just want to have pun.
Yes, and Rulez should be punished for their insolence.
What a worldwide punomenon.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:00 pm
by Adsolution
Rulez wrote:
RayFan9876 wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Rsandee wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Spanex wrote:The word "Private" mean anything to you?
Yeah, it's a soldier of the lowest military rank. Why?
Image
Rulez just want to have pun.
Yes, and Rulez should be punished for their insolence.
What a worldwide punomenon.
No thanks, I prefer punatomy.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:01 pm
by Rulez
RayFan9876 wrote:
Rulez wrote:
RayFan9876 wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Rsandee wrote:
Rulez wrote:
Spanex wrote:The word "Private" mean anything to you?
Yeah, it's a soldier of the lowest military rank. Why?
Image
Rulez just want to have pun.
Yes, and Rulez should be punished for their insolence.
What a worldwide punomenon.
No thanks, I prefer punatomy.
I see. Well, I have to go to sleep in a minute, thankfully I have my iPod so I can listen to punk. It's relaxing.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:14 pm
by ikke471
Holy..... Lol...

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:51 am
by Canard WC
I demand a public apology on the part of RayFan9876 for his insolence and Rulez for his insults. The concerned parties have forty-eight (48) hours from the publication of this message to do so. Refusal to comply within the given delay will result in drastic consequences. Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:57 am
by Adsolution
Canard WC wrote:I demand a public apology on the part of RayFan9876 for his insolence and Rulez for his insults. The concerned parties have forty-eight (48) hours from the publication of this message to do so. Refusal to comply within the given delay will result in drastic consequences. Image
Shut it, bitch. I shall only do as Science commands.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:10 am
by DesLife
I guess people will never learn that arguing with Canard is most of the time quite a bad idea. :tssk:

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:17 am
by Matyuv
They're literally asking to get WC'd.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:08 am
by Adsolution
The only sort of apology I give is one so stupidly ridiculous that it's not even worth it. I hold my word.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:29 am
by MLII
RayFan's a she, Canard. Just thought you should know. ^^

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:44 am
by Hunchman801
DesLife wrote:I guess people will never learn that arguing with Canard is most of the time quite a bad idea. :tssk:
People never learn. :boon:
Matyuv wrote:They're literally asking to get WC'd.
Well I don't want anyone whining over their desktop wallpaper featuring gay men in action this time. :roll:

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:02 pm
by Canard WC
MLII wrote:RayFan's a she, Canard. Just thought you should know. ^^
No, he isn't. He is a homosexual, effeminate male masquerading in female clothing. Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:17 pm
by Spanex
How wrong you are :oops2:

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:20 pm
by Canard WC
Spanex wrote:How wrong you are :oops2:
May I ask you to clarify your thoughts? Image

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:29 pm
by Spanex
I should let her clarify that to you.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:38 pm
by Rulez
As for clarifying, I explained Canard that I did not insult him. Here:

Ah, then sorry if you thought of it as an insult Canard, it was supposed to mean something like ''OH CRAP'' because sometimes people use that word not to describe someone, but to tell people about their discomfort, et cetera. I hope this clears stuff up.

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:20 pm
by spiraldoor
MLII wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:Why all the paranoia? What do you two have to hide?
Oh Spiral you so silly.
Don’t attempt to condescend to me, or I’ll tell your step-sister. :mrgreen:
MLII wrote:PMs are there so that if there are things we won't to say that we don't want to splash ALL OVER THE FORUM, we don't have to. o-o Therefore if somebody went through my PM inbox they would see things that are private between me and Example User and...yeah.
I’ve never been unwise enough to send sensitive information across the internet, so this does not trouble me. However, your anxious behaviour is making me very suspicious; now I’m beginning to hope that Canard rifles through your PMs to make sure you haven’t been up to anything unsavoury. :up:

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:58 pm
by Adsolution
Hunchman801 wrote:
DesLife wrote:I guess people will never learn that arguing with Canard is most of the time quite a bad idea. :tssk:
People never learn. :boon:
Matyuv wrote:They're literally asking to get WC'd.
Well I don't want anyone whining over their desktop wallpaper featuring gay men in action this time. :roll:
You mean this thing?

http://www.sillytext.com/pics/955-o.jpg

Re: Of the extermination of furfags

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:04 pm
by spiraldoor
In future, please link to gay pictures rather than posting them, Rayfan.