Page 3 of 11

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:02 pm
by Jona
There's nothing to be easy about Pacman or not... wrong comparison.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:14 pm
by Reese Riverson
Spaceray wrote:Okay, I see. I seem to remember ryanmcd blabbering on about it.
You know, you'd better watch what you say, or he may get on to you. :P

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:17 pm
by Ogre
Wisemen says, Hoodcom. You're damn right. :mrgreen:

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:21 pm
by Xenon
Hoodcom wrote:
Spaceray wrote:Okay, I see. I seem to remember ryanmcd blabbering on about it.
You know, you'd better watch what you say, or he may get on to you. :P
That's a good point. *Hides*

But blabbering isn't TOO bad!!!

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:22 pm
by Xeiqu
Damn right? Sure is.

Curse you to hell Spaceray, CURSE YOU!

Hello.

:D

I'm glad I've left the impression of the over-reactive-Rayman-4-related-clue-searcher on you all.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:25 pm
by Xenon
Just leave Rayman 4 to the experts, Ubisoft, K? :wink: :wink: :wink:

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:27 pm
by Xeiqu
And we all know how reliable and constantly informative they can be, don't we?

If there's one thing I've learned about Ubisoft, it's that theres not a lot to work on, so you've got a lot of time to work on it.

Every line released has to be searched hundreds of times!

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:31 pm
by Xenon
Yes, I suppose Ubisoft are very lazy. I just hope Rayman 4 will be as good as expected.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:31 pm
by Reese Riverson
We've had it with ubi soft exept Ruy didn't, but now he has. :lol:

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:33 pm
by Xenon
Yes well, we don't need Ubisoft to run this forum, do we? We have reliable old Hunch! :D

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:38 pm
by Reese Riverson
We know hunchman does work on the forum and is active. Ubi Razz wasn't active nor worked on RZ. Hunchy is better. :D

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:40 pm
by Xenon
It wasn't just UbiRazz. It was all the admins! But UbiRazz was the worst.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:59 pm
by Jona
You were only active in the period UbiRazz was active, so how can you possibly dare saying this? Thunak was much worse actually.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:04 pm
by Xenon
May I remind you that I had more than one account.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:10 pm
by Hunchman801
Well, the admins I remember are Ryosan and Darkam for the French forums, Cartrix and Thunak for the english forums... Ryosan didn't care and hardly came over, Darkam was even worse. Cartrix was literally non-existent... Thunak wasn't much better, and I don't know about UbiRazz...

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 7:14 pm
by Jona
No, cartrix was the best. It's damn sad that he suddenly left without doing anything for four months... if he had stayed goldfist would have been banned back in June and the forums would still have been clean for months.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:10 pm
by th3()ne
Indeed. I remember Cartrix being the best, I've heard loads about him!

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 8:12 pm
by Hunchman801
Well, maybe he was the best, but anyways I remember him, he was a very bad admin...

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2005 9:16 pm
by Xenon
What was RZAdmin like? And BBContact too.

Re: Yes, I still exist.

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:43 pm
by th3()ne
There are four kinds of Social Networking Models, the first of which is the Explicit Network. Explicit Networks are called as such because anyone can just browse through the identities and connections of the people who belong in the community. Connections are made by stating identities, interests, and associations, and by introducing yourself to someone based on who he claims to be or know.