Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:10 pm

O.K., so now take a look at "Paradox Interactive presents Rayman 2".

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:32 pm

Stan, it's like you're Windows, and I'm Linux.

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:37 pm

Maybe, but what's ununderstandable?

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:44 pm

Okay, you keep talking about "Paradox Interactive", whatever that is. Then you say "UbiSoft presents Rayman 2" or something like that. I mean...what are you talking about? Must you always be so cryptic?

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 5:51 pm

Imagine a developer called Paradox Interactive. Now, with your theory, it is the only one developer which can develop Rayman game with stupid toad called Globox.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:01 pm

Your mind seems to reach beyond the normal four dimensions of space and time.

Now, back on topic.

El Dango · Post by **El Dango** » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:12 pm

stan423321 wrote:Imagine a developer called Paradox Interactive. Now, with your theory, it is the only one developer which can develop Rayman game with stupid toad called Globox.

Just call me crazy, but i think i get his point.
Stan. Do you mean that because Spiraldoor said that stupid dogs can't be in Rayman games because they are stupid, which Globox is, he created a paradox, and then the company who made the games should be called Paxadox Interactive? If i'm right here, i deserve a gold medal.

Spanex · Post by **Spanex** » Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:35 am

Yah, well back on topic. D:

So if games with high resemblance and matching facts are canon, then I would think Rayman: Hoodlums' Revenge is not canon, because there it says Rayman can't swim (although I would understand that they did that to make the game harder, they could've also said it was poisonous...). While in most games except Rayman 1 he can. And when I look in Raywiki, it says he was taught to swim in Revolution, and in R3 he seems to have even found a way to make himself go faster using his helicopter.

Tell me if I don't get it now. XD

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:46 pm

El Dango wrote:
stan423321 wrote:Imagine a developer called Paradox Interactive. Now, with your theory, it is the only one developer which can develop Rayman game with stupid toad called Globox.
Just call me crazy, but i think i get his point.
Stan. Do you mean that because Spiraldoor said that stupid dogs can't be in Rayman games because they are stupid, which Globox is, he created a paradox, and then the company who made the games should be called Paxadox Interactive? If i'm right here, i deserve a gold medal.

: dango.gif (1.86 KiB) Viewed 3398 times

Spanex wrote:So if games with high resemblance and matching facts are canon, then I would think Rayman: Hoodlums' Revenge is not canon, because there it says Rayman can't swim (although I would understand that they did that to make the game harder, they could've also said it was poisonous...). While in most games except Rayman 1 he can. And when I look in Raywiki, it says he was taught to swim in Revolution, and in R3 he seems to have even found a way to make himself go faster using his helicopter.

This is somehow right.

Joshua822 · Post by **Joshua822** » Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:18 pm

The pink water is poisoness. I don't see why regular water is tough, that would make the rivers of murk level a lot easier.

Spanex · Post by **Spanex** » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:18 pm

I more of referred to all the water in the game. Not only the pink one.

El Dango · Post by **El Dango** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:19 pm

stan423321 wrote:
El Dango wrote:
stan423321 wrote:Imagine a developer called Paradox Interactive. Now, with your theory, it is the only one developer which can develop Rayman game with stupid toad called Globox.
Just call me crazy, but i think i get his point.
Stan. Do you mean that because Spiraldoor said that stupid dogs can't be in Rayman games because they are stupid, which Globox is, he created a paradox, and then the company who made the games should be called Paxadox Interactive? If i'm right here, i deserve a gold medal.
*gold medal image*

YAY!

Joshua822 · Post by **Joshua822** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:21 am

Mmm... gold medal

*Wins olympic gold medal and eat's it"

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:15 pm

What did it taste like?

And I don't think Hoodlums' Revenge is canon, it's too...

...not the same...

Holy Crap · Post by **Holy Crap** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:49 am

It doesn't even work with the story anyway.

Joshua822 · Post by **Joshua822** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:32 am

*Wins olympic gold medal and eat's it"

It tasted like honey

Acarr · Post by **Acarr** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:47 am

I thought it was gold?

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:52 pm

It was!

Acarr · Post by **Acarr** » Sun Nov 02, 2008 3:58 pm

Those Gold medals arn't cheap you know...

Post by **The Jonster** » Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:22 am

Bump.

Well I can definitely say imo that Rayman 1, 2, and 3 are definitely canon. Though with the recent posts from Michel Ancel wanting to do Rayman's "fourth adventure" in the future, I find myself questioning where the UbiArt games fit in.

Rayman Pirate-Community

Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?

Re: Which witch?

Re: Which Rayman Games Are Canon?