Rayman Pirate-Community

C'mon, it's a different series now. They'll eventually release a Rayman game one day, and raging over rabbids won't bring it any sooner.

Sorry, but that's just not what the market wants. And it won't change in a year or two. There isn't much place anymore for games like Rayman / Beyond Good & evil in the market where Ubisoft wants to focus on. And even if we'd get a Rayman platformer, it would really be dumbed down to fit the casual gaming market.

I'm not raging, i'm just saying stuff the way it is.

spiraldoor wrote:http://www.oflc.gov.au/www/cob/find.nsf ... enDocument

This gives me will to cry.

Oww god damnit NOO! ><*

...Now I havn't any hope to see a Rayman 4...

spiraldoor wrote:Also, Kleaneasy is very boon and is not to be trusted.

What do you hold against her anyway?

PluMGMK wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:Also, Kleaneasy is very boon and is not to be trusted.

What do you hold against her anyway?

Too much shit to even list.

Hunchman801 wrote:C'mon, it's a different series now. They'll eventually release a Rayman game one day, and raging over rabbids won't bring it any sooner.

There's no guarantee that they will even make another Rayman game, or that is will be any good. And Ubisoft hearing negative fan reaction to the rabbids games will make Rayman 4 more likely to happen sooner.

spiraldoor wrote:And Ubisoft hearing negative fan reaction to the rabbids games will make Rayman 4 more likely to happen sooner.

But they don't hear it. I wish there was something proactive we could do, but we're stuck here and worse *shudder* on RZ!

PC members represent a small sample of players anyway... Ubisoft prefer to visit proper, neutral gaming review sites as opposed to fansites.

spiraldoor wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:Also, Kleaneasy is very boon and is not to be trusted.

What do you hold against her anyway?

Too much shit to even list.

Well, tell me some things, somehow. I need to know.

PluMGMK wrote:

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote:And yes, we DO need an article on this.

I don't see why.

Because it's a Rabbids game. Which makes it a spin-off of the Rayman series. I figure that would be obvious.

Actually, we don't need an article about Rabbids Go Home since it:
1) Doesn't even have Rayman in the title
and 2) Doesn't even have a cameo appearance of Rayman.

Joshua822 wrote:Actually, we don't need an article about Rabbids Go Home since it:
1) Doesn't even have Rayman in the title
and 2) Doesn't even have a cameo appearance of Rayman.

Alright, first of all, we're not TALKING about Rabbids Go Home, and second, yes we do. Look at the Mario Wiki for example. They have an article about all the Donkey Kong and Warioware characters and games. Just because Rayman's not in it doesn't mean it has nothing to do with Rayman. Like it or not, Rabbids will ALWAYS be a spinoff of Rayman, no matter how many games they get by themselves. And no one, not even Michel Ancel, can undo that.
(We also have an article about Tonic Trouble, which didn't even spin-off from Rayman)

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote: (We also have an article about Tonic Trouble, which didn't even spin-off from Rayman)

How many times do we have to say this?
It was made in the Rayman 2 engine, look on Raywiki.

Rayman4321 wrote:

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote: (We also have an article about Tonic Trouble, which didn't even spin-off from Rayman)

How many times do we have to say this?
It was made in the Rayman 2 engine, look on Raywiki.

So, a game that was made with the same engine as a Rayman game gets an article, but a game that actually stemed from the Rayman series doesn't?

There were some serious references/connections between R2(R) and Tonic Trouble, hence the mention in RayWiki.

RGH may be a continued "spin-off" but it doesn't feature Rayman at all and so doesn't really have any clear reference. Maybe it deserves to be mentioned, but the RayWiki mainly focuses on the original Rayman games and not the Rabbids franchise in extention.

For example: Rayman is in the credits.

Not a well-done Rayman, but still Rayman nonetheless.

Xenon wrote:There were some serious references/connections between R2(R) and Tonic Trouble, hence the mention in RayWiki.

RGH may be a continued "spin-off" but it doesn't feature Rayman at all and so doesn't really have any clear reference. Maybe it deserves to be mentioned, but the RayWiki mainly focuses on the original Rayman games and not the Rabbids franchise in extention.

http://www.mariowiki.com/Conker

I still am not convinced that Rabbids shouldn't get articles about their games, but whatever, just forget it. I don't care anymore. Just pretend this conversation never happened.

Rayman4321 wrote:

Sabertooth1000000000 wrote: (We also have an article about Tonic Trouble, which didn't even spin-off from Rayman)

How many times do we have to say this?
It was made in the Rayman 2 engine, look on Raywiki.

So Crysis gets an article? Presuming that RayFan's game gets one, of course.

PluMGMK wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:Also, Kleaneasy is very boon and is not to be trusted.

What do you hold against her anyway?

Too much shit to even list.

Well, tell me some things, somehow. I need to know.

looking at some of her posts, she can be very patronising when she wants.

I don't know if you knew this already, but I just saw Rabbids Lab on WiiWare and it's just the rabbid inside the Wii-mote thing from Rabbids Go Home.
So it's nothing to worry about. ^-^

Quickfist wrote:I don't know if you knew this already, but I just saw Rabbids Lab on WiiWare and it's just the rabbid inside the Wii-mote thing from Rabbids Go Home.
So it's nothing to worry about. ^-^

Yeah, that was debated on RGH topic already.