Rayman Pirate-Community

DesLife wrote:Clever. What's the point in being beautiful ?

More sex. Plus stupid people are generally more carefree and happy.

I voted for clever and ugly. I hate the slutty bitches in school who think it's cool to be a dumb-fuck. That isn't saying that I'm ugly or smart btw xP

StaceyW wrote:Glad to see someone agreeing with me on the fact that we don't need so many more babies right now, at least in the UK anyway. As much as I'd like my sister to get a new home with her boyfriend, I don't appreciate it being built on top of every single bit of grass left.

I think it's funny how they're building houses on flood lands in England.

I think good looking (and hopefully not dumb), but i voted for clever, because then you could always do something about you're look

Not if you looked like Juliana Wetmore. Gah, wish I knew the name of that other baby I saw that looks like it has two balls on its head.

Wow.... i saw some of the photos with my copy of Luigi's mansion with the theme music playing on the background.... (not to be mean) but is she clever?

Aw man, I feel really sorry for that little girl. It's terrible when you see people with those conditions, and to think that they get bullied for it as well...

Wow I feel bad. Sometimes we forget about what we really do have.

Bullying itself isn't that of a crime in my eyes, only if you get bully'd for something you can't help, like this.

I think bullying someone because of thier disablements is just wrong its just low when it comes to bullying

You should see some of the other deformed babies I've seen, some of them are quite shocking. Juliana's lucky that she's got her folks to actually try and get her face done, but others like the Indian baby with 2 faces were not.

StaceyW wrote:Not if you looked like Juliana Wetmore. Gah, wish I knew the name of that other baby I saw that looks like it has two balls on its head.

Modern art

Acarr wrote:I voted for clever and ugly. I hate the slutty bitches in school who think it's cool to be a dumb-fuck. That isn't saying that I'm ugly or smart btw xP

StaceyW wrote:Glad to see someone agreeing with me on the fact that we don't need so many more babies right now, at least in the UK anyway. As much as I'd like my sister to get a new home with her boyfriend, I don't appreciate it being built on top of every single bit of grass left.

I think it's funny how they're building houses on flood lands in England.

Same thing has already happened in the US. Just pave over the swamp, and don't tell people it floods every year. Another reason I'm against the current system and feel that the government should step in more to control the businesses and land. Not to mention urban sprawl has made us dependent upon cars, roads, and oil. People here in NF complain about the bus system so darn much, but it's still 1000 times better than that found in Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, etc., because everything so spread out due to sprawl it's virtually impossible to have a competent public transit system, unless you put 50 or so more trains or 100 or so more buses in use.

Besides, on my earlier point, and to throw in one last argument for what I said for no need for larger families these days, I actually believe that if a single child is paid attention to enough, taught enough, shown enough, there are greater odds that they will become smarter. Though, there are those that don't get there, because well, there are those that simply refuse to follow or learn, but it is the same point that was brought by Hunch before in another topic, when he noted friends outsmarting people with phD's in America.

Quality, not quantity in a population, is needed. That doesn't necessarily mean eugenics (that's not what I'm suggesting at all), that just means a better frickin' education system and a better structured community rather than letting it go willy-nilly taking up every last bit of land simply because every single person on the face of the earth needs approx. 1/2 mile of space around them, a brand new house, a car, and a highway to spend about 30 minutes on to get to work each day.

Quite simply, I think so many people have unrealized potential. It's potential that's never filled because instead we are forced to concentrate and compensate for the masses rather than be allowed to focus on a set few. Lower number of children in every family equals better funding and ease on the parents' behalf, on the government's behalf, and on the schooling system's behalf.

Which brings me what I voted in the poll: smarts, I'd say. And not to ignore the post above me:

New quick poll. I just wanna see how many people bite the bears' heads off first like I do.
Will probably think of a better and more serious subject next time

haha, sometimes I do bite the heads off. :B Otherwise it's just chew or suck.

I don't even eat them anymore because the vast majority of them are made of gelatine [in b4 veggie wank]. Haven't done for yonks.

I just eat it, so option 3.

I bite the heads off first just because it's also something my dad would use to make fun of me when I was younger (about 3 or 4 years old)

"Oh? Who's this?

Wait OOOH NOOOOOOOO..." *head's bitten off*

Very Mr. Bill of him.

I bite the limbs off first but I can't think of a reason why I do so

Unfortunately, most gummy bears have limbs melded into their bodies, so you can't really dismember them.

I put it all in my mouth and eat it. x3 However I rarely eat gummy sweets.