Re: Rayman remake rumor - confirmed by Ubisoft!
Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 1:49 pm
That's insightful, thanks for sharing. I wonder if Soliani's departure from the company last summer could have anything to do with this.
Don’t tell me you’re one of those people who just assumes anything to do with AI is badEdgeRabbit wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:26 pm I don't think l'll buy this game unless changes are made to its development, cuz if AI is involved then i'm not interested at all.
I think he meant specifically generative AI, and if that's the case I'm also very concerned. Let's hope this just remains a rumour though.Greengoop wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:15 pm Don’t tell me you’re one of those people who just assumes anything to do with AI is bad![]()
No, i mostly mean generative AI. I mostly only care for ones who take peoples jobs, not ones that help find cancer or stuff along that line. Though lets keep on topicGreengoop wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:15 pm Don’t tell me you’re one of those people who just assumes anything to do with AI is bad![]()
Bro, it's Ubisoft we're talking about. They have been in complete disarray for a few years now. Nobody should have high hopes for this supposed remake because there is quite a significant chance that this project only exists to rev up the IP and entice Tencent to buyout the licence.RayCarrot wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 1:29 pm Reg. the new rumors, it hasn't been discussed here yet but there are some more concerning signs about this project. Giacomo has made several tweets which hint at things maybe not going so well behind the scenes and that we might be in for a disappointment.
Well in light of these rumours, and not even a day into this announcement. UbiSoft never fails to disappoint. I know I've been a bit snide but part of me legitimately hoped that maybe...just maybe, in light of all the shit that Ubi's embroiled themselves with in the last few years...they'd get their arses in gear. But it sounds like things are already in a troubled position.Master wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2024 3:42 pm Colour me genuinely surprised. Considering UbiSoft's history, I'll admit I have mixed feelings even if this does turn out to be true. I'm not sure how substantiated the claims about Ancel are, but I can imagine morale there is pretty low as-is, and for good reason considering the stuff that is substantiated about other UbiSoft members. I really hope that if this is in development that it isn't going to turn into a toxic shitshow.
Indeed it does! I’m also gonna stay optimistic since that’s what a lot of the community is lacking sometimes
Quebec is like Europe outside of Europe, its french is identical to Frances.. So it is very FrenchGreengoop wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:13 pm I doubt it’s particularly French though, I’d assume it’d kinda be like like difference between the UK and the States
Technology has always "taken" people's jobs, and no matter what the Luddites thought in the 19th century, I think we're all pretty happy to not be working on handlooms anymore, unless it's for fun. But it has also created many more types of occupation, and I don't know why generative AI would be a different story. Sure, it has entered the space of creative occupations, but if an AI creates better illustrations than some people, then maybe they ought to find a different job!EdgeRabbit wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:37 pm No, i mostly mean generative AI. I mostly only care for ones who take peoples jobs, not ones that help find cancer or stuff along that line.
Indeed, they are culturally American.Greengoop wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 5:13 pm I doubt it’s particularly French though, I’d assume it’d kinda be like like difference between the UK and the States
Lols, now you choose to worry about that?Greengoop wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 4:41 pm This is sorta on topic since it’s discussing our thoughts on AI within this series. But I think we should steer it back on track before this topic gets derailed completely
I find it somewhat amusing how this is the one thing we can reliably count on with them lately