Page 212 of 263
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:26 pm
by Serza5
5/10, and I was being fairly generous there because Razorbeard at least looks good. But things that bothered me includes :
- The background in general just looks icky and just barely passes for not being eye burning
- I am not sure if the background itself is doing it but you can see pixels floating around both the text and Razorbeard although more noticeable around the text.
- Speaking of the text it's a rather boring font and the colour, again just barely passes for not being eye burning.
I also recommend not saving sigs as JPG/JPEG, that may also by why I see pixelation around the sig.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:27 pm
by incognito
And mine?
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:30 pm
by Serza5
Hm, again a 5. The lightsaber effect (Which is what i'm assuming it is) doesn't look that great nor am I a fan of "tall" sigs (or rather, sigs which are longer in height than width). The rendering, i'll give you, is not all that bad, as with the idea.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 9:43 pm
by incognito
Argh!
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:08 am
by Adsolution
I actually advise against tall signatures. It doesn't matter how wide it is really, it's the height that causes so much unnecessarily scrolling. Your signature literally takes up the entirety of my laptop screen, which is just retarded if you take a step back and think about what a signature actually is.
Also, if you're using Photoshop, I'd suggest applying the Screen blend effect to the lightsaber, so that it takes its transparency from the brightness instead of the alpha.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:47 am
by Harpic fraîcheur
incognito wrote:Argh!
8/10

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:31 am
by incognito
Adsolution wrote:I actually advise against tall signatures. It doesn't matter how wide it is really, it's the height that causes so much unnecessarily scrolling. Your signature literally takes up the entirety of my laptop screen, which is just retarded if you take a step back and think about what a signature actually is.
Also, if you're using Photoshop, I'd suggest applying the Screen blend effect to the lightsaber, so that it takes its transparency from the brightness instead of the alpha.
Im using GIMP, yo !
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:42 am
by Adsolution
I'm sure that GIMP has something like that too.
Also, can you please make it smaller, or at least shorter? You can probably chop off everything below the arms.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:20 pm
by OCG
10/10 but the faces boost the up to 13.4
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 4:48 am
by Bradandez
I have my Valentine's Day signature ready.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:47 am
by OCG
Nice, but I liked the one with Toad better

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:35 am
by Harpic fraîcheur
My new sign !

Rayman makes the finger!
He has no respect !!! é_è
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:56 am
by Adsolution
8.5/10 - I usually find GIF signatures, unless subtle, to be really, really distracting, but while still distracting, it fits pretty cozy, and also, Spanu. <3
Amusingly, Spanex actually made that animation because I showed her a little animation I made a couple years ago (
http://www.deviantart.com/download/3088 ... 1392462350 ) and she wanted to give it a try.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 12:44 pm
by Dart
10/10 Rayman looks so badass
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 12:55 pm
by Harpic fraîcheur
Thanks you adsolution and darthofthedavros.

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:13 pm
by Rayman fan2000
GeekOfTheGame wrote:Thanks you adsolution and darthofthedavros.

dartofthedavros was rating Adsolution's sig, actually.
Anyway, 7/10.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:22 pm
by Serza5
Hm.
@RayFan2k : 6/10, nothing too unpleasing but Sonic looks too dark (especially in contrast with the BG) and the text is just eh.
@GOTG : 7.5/10, Spanex does fine works but the sig is too big for my liking. Also I find the animation to be far too fast.
@Brad: 9/10, simple but effective, only real issue is that i'm not fond of the blurry effect on the text, perhaps you blurred it a tad too much? It'd also of been nice if it were a light yellow rather than pure white.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:30 pm
by Harpic fraîcheur
Serza5 wrote:Hm.
@RayFan2k : 6/10, nothing too unpleasing but Sonic looks too dark (especially in contrast with the BG) and the text is just eh.
@GOTG : 7.5/10, Spanex does fine works but the sig is too big for my liking. Also I find the animation to be far too fast.
@Brad: 9/10, simple but effective, only real issue is that i'm not fond of the blurry effect on the text, perhaps you blurred it a tad too much? It'd also of been nice if it
were a light yellow rather than pure white.
Thanks

Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:15 pm
by Bradandez
OldClassicGamer wrote:Nice, but I liked the one with Toad better

THAT'S NOT A RATING!
:3
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:16 pm
by Dart
9/10