Page 23 of 249
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:36 pm
by Jman
Oh thats makes.
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:35 pm
by Hunchman801
Let us hope he will play it some day ^^
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:34 pm
by supmachin
Do not know Begoniax is not important because she is very ugly. I prefer know pretty characters!

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:11 pm
by Xenon
Still, a big enemy.
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:59 pm
by Avis0
Who is the enemy in Rayman 3?
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:07 pm
by Xenon
Andre, of course

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:34 am
by Hunchman801
I advise you to play Rayman 3, Avis0

It is a great game

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:33 am
by Avis0
Yes, I want to, but I don't find it, as you know, I live in Mexico, and here there aren't many games such as in USA and there are cheappier, so I will go about the first days of august to El Paso, Texas, and I will get thta game even if I need to kill someone(is a joke of course)

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 12:33 pm
by supmachin
Andre is so ugly.

Everybody is ugly in Rayman

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:31 pm
by Xenon
You should not judge people on their looks

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:35 pm
by supmachin
No, somepeople are cool but they are ugly. But Rayman is cool, funny and Teensies too.

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:38 pm
by Xenon
The Teensies are quite good looking, for mythical creatures

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:40 pm
by supmachin
Yep, so they are cool, and everycharacters are cool in Rayman, with the funny look, but they are ugly ^^
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 2:42 pm
by Xenon
Aww, why do you think that?

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:23 pm
by Avis0
I think ubisoft is making a great mistake about rayman games. If a game is perfect and becomes a great hit, such as rayman 2, logically the next game you don't need to change many things and keep the style of the good game, but ubisoft don't understand and rayman 3 isn't as good as rayman 2, it miss the magical style of rayman 2. But well, one time isn't a big error, so everyone hopes that the rayman 4 will have again the magic of rayman 2, but what do they show? A game-comedy?! A rabbits invasion! If they saw that the magic of rayman 2 make it a great game, why do they don't keep the magic for rayman 3 and 4? I think that Rayman 3 willl be even better than 4, just because there will be for new consoles doesn't mean that they can do the worst story they can imagine. It still will be a good game, but Ubisoft is making a great mistake, what do you think about it?
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:50 pm
by Xenon
Avis0 wrote:I think ubisoft is making a great mistake about rayman games. If a game is perfect and becomes a great hit, such as rayman 2, logically the next game you don't need to change many things and keep the style of the good game, but ubisoft don't understand and rayman 3 isn't as good as rayman 2, it miss the magical style of rayman 2. But well, one time isn't a big error, so everyone hopes that the rayman 4 will have again the magic of rayman 2, but what do they show? A game-comedy?! A rabbits invasion! If they saw that the magic of rayman 2 make it a great game, why do they don't keep the magic for rayman 3 and 4? I think that Rayman 3 willl be even better than 4, just because there will be for new consoles doesn't mean that they can do the worst story they can imagine. It still will be a good game, but Ubisoft is making a great mistake, what do you think about it?
Well, people say Rayman 3 wasn't as great because Ancel didn't work with the team. However, rest assured, he will be working on R4.

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 11:10 pm
by Avis0
Well, but now that he is working in rayman 4, why do they are taking the magic off from rayman games and making a comedy instead of a good story of rayman 4?
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 7:41 pm
by Hunchman801
Avis0 wrote:I think ubisoft is making a great mistake about rayman games. If a game is perfect and becomes a great hit, such as rayman 2, logically the next game you don't need to change many things and keep the style of the good game, but ubisoft don't understand and rayman 3 isn't as good as rayman 2, it miss the magical style of rayman 2. But well, one time isn't a big error, so everyone hopes that the rayman 4 will have again the magic of rayman 2, but what do they show? A game-comedy?! A rabbits invasion! If they saw that the magic of rayman 2 make it a great game, why do they don't keep the magic for rayman 3 and 4? I think that Rayman 3 willl be even better than 4, just because there will be for new consoles doesn't mean that they can do the worst story they can imagine. It still will be a good game, but Ubisoft is making a great mistake, what do you think about it?
You are damn right. It does not seem that any Sanctuaries are coming back

Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:28 pm
by Avis0
Finally someone is with me! I don't really like that idea about making a game comedy of rayman 4 instead of a magic adventure as rayman 2, I think that if ubisoft continues like that, each game the rayman franchise is closer to death
Re: Rayman himself
Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:58 pm
by supmachin
They adapt to the general public, sadly. It is bad for us.

Bad for fans.