Rayman Pirate-Community

Eshap wrote:what is going on it's 1:30 and my head hurts
what is all this ambiguous pie

Eshap wrote:ambiguous pie

Robotic Teensie wrote:Remember when I posted in this thread I had decompiled Rayman 2? I now have a better decompiler. It doesn't leave asm inside the code. I also decompiled the Rayman Designer Mapper, Rayman 3 and Rayman Origins with it

The compiler also has an option to decompile DOS programs, but I've had no luck so far with Rayman 1...

Origins apparently has a debugging file (.pdb) linked to it... too bad it isn't available... that would make the code so much more readable.

Robotic Teensie wrote:Remember when I posted in this thread I had decompiled Rayman 2? I now have a better decompiler. It doesn't leave asm inside the code. I also decompiled the Rayman Designer Mapper [..] with it

00 00 8b ce e8 26 1a 02 00 6a 00 e8 70 11 00 00 83 c4 04 e8 98 13 00 00 33 c0 8a 88 c0 10 43 00 88 88 08 0d 45 00 40 84 c9 75 ef c7 05 38 a6 43 00 00 00 00 00 e8 a6 1b 00 00 6a 00 8d 4c 24 08 e8 1b 01 00 00 8d 44 24 04 8d 4c 24 04 c7 84 24 a8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 89 46 1c e8 03 ac 01 00 8d 4c 24 60 c7 84 24 a8 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 e8 8f 11 02 00 8d 4c 24 04 c7 84 24 a8 00 00 00 ff

else
  {
    MessageBoxA(
      0,
      "Please check your DirectX version. At least version 8.1 is required.",
      "Rayman 3 Setup Error",
      0x10u);
  }
  return 0;
}

    CWinApp::Enable3dControlsStatic(v1);
    sub_402290(0);
    sub_4024C0();
    v2 = 0;
    do
    {
      v3 = byte_4310C0[v2];
      *(&FileName + v2++) = v3;
    }
    while ( v3 );
    dword_43A638 = 0;
    sub_402CF0();
    sub_401270(0);

(...) the nature of disassembly precludes total accuracy, and a great deal of human intervention is necessarily required (...) (the) user will begin with an automatically generated disassembly listing and then convert sections from code to data and vice versa, rename, annotate, and otherwise add information to the listing, until it becomes clear what it does.

Shrooblord wrote:Well, for one, a while loop would never end in a ; before telling the program what it should be looping. That should be some indication. Strangely enough, the 'do' step with the method in enclosed brackets is before the while loop, which is usually the thing that the while loop should be doing. This makes me think that that excerpt of code you have is the wrong way around! Or at least, the while() do section is in the wrong order.

do
    {
      v3 = byte_4310C0[v2];
      *(&FileName + v2++) = v3;
    }
    while ( v3 );