Rayman Pirate-Community

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alw5hs0c ... lf=mh_lolz

check it out

Hah, I've seen that.

PowerPatrick wrote:

CURSE YOU SEAMAANNN



...Well I thought it was funny

Thank you all for making this thread so utterly retarded. Now I suggest you either stop that right now or go to /b/. Unless you want to face the mighty banhammer.

DesLife wrote:Thank you all for making this thread so utterly retarded. Now I suggest you either stop that right now or go to /b/. Unless you want to face the mighty banhammer.

no

Well, to be honest it was retarded anyway.

neo wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alw5hs0c ... lf=mh_lolz

check it out

Haha, just saw that now. Nice!

MLII wrote:Well, to be honest it was retarded anyway.

Furry sympathiser.

neo wrote:Hunch, aren't you the one that is being a bit dumb?

She means that you are implying that there could have been no hacks from onsite to cover your back... for some reason. Yet I have a hard time believing that that isn't possible, my friend. I could care less, but I'd think you'd have to reflect upon it a bit more for your community. Also, hopefully we can get that Solaris skin as a skin we can select, because I really liked it.

RayFan expressed concern over the fact that my account might have been hijacked, which was ridiculous and justifies our reaction. What you are trying to imply is different, yet quite as dumb, if not even more: the logs have been thoroughly checked and clearly show that the queries were sent from RayFan, MLII and sergio's computers.

I would also like to know how a vulnerability on our side could have caused one's desktop to be turned into a depiction of gay men in action; anyone familiar with the history of PC knows what I'm talking about.

So, if you don't mind, I'll leave you to your ludicrous remarks and end this sterile discussion before I have to repeat myself for the thousandth time.

Yet I think you should be a bit more understanding when your members are concerned.

Also, I didn't know about the desktop thing. I read the history, I must have missed it.

(I did read more of 2005 until the present. Only recently did I read the history from before. )

So, what do you suggest? I fail to see what we could have done more.

Moreover, I find it very hypocritical to ask for understanding and concern when the members in question were warned many times not to indulge in gratuitous provocation towards suspicious persons or groups, especially when there is nothing we can do. Some of them apparently like being hacked so much that they've done it again since then, so how can you expect us to break our backs for people who do nothing but look for it? Get a sense of reality.