Rayman Pirate-Community

Indeed. However, I suppose we can all agree on the fact that Sergio is one silly, silly man?

Adsolution wrote:Indeed. However, I suppose we can all agree on the fact that Sergio is one silly, silly man?

Yap.

I also think that it isn't that difficult to emulate the one-click touch with a mouse, afterall there are games like Angry Birds that got perfectly ported to PC, 3DS and so on.

It would only require one person using the mouse and other using the keyboard.

Anyway, so far I had a good impression about the Wii U. I only found the controller a bit heavy but it can be it was because of the huge wire that was holding it to prevent people from stealing.

I forgot to say: I've never had a problem with multiplayer on a PC. I play four-player Brawl on my 13" laptop with friends quite often for example, and I see nothing wrong and there are no complaints. I never understood why people would say "PC isn't good for multiplayer."

Probably because they aren't really used to computer gaming.

I'm a PC player by default so I'm already used to gaming in keyboards, and I've done many multiplayer matches on my computer and I never had issues.

You could always take the mouse and its pad on your lap instead of taking up the desktop space, if that's bothering you. Multiplayering on PC is fine - I played JJ2 with my cousin loads of times before she grew out of it. :'(
Especially if you have the ease of assigning two different parts of the keyboard to different players, say keypad for one and the spacebar area for another, there's no difficulty at all.

Adsolution wrote:Indeed. However, I suppose we can all agree on the fact that Sergio is one silly, silly man?

You can bet that.

Well, there's the big problem, you can make it work with a mouse, sure, actually that's the way how every DS emulator works, but considering the fact that the Wii emulator barely works and that there are no functional Xbox 360/Playstation 3 emulators (and as I said before, your pc should be processing one screen in 720p and the other one in 480p), I see that idea being too far from now. I was fucking around with you, you know that's the way how I treat you, that's the way how I develop my love for you, you cocky cock cockidy dick with pieces of sausage and cheddar cheese.

sergiomonty wrote:the Wii emulator barely works

Dolphin emulates Wii games almost flawlessly for me.

Adsolution wrote:

sergiomonty wrote:the Wii emulator barely works

Dolphin emulates Wii games almost flawlessly for me.

How did you steal that computer from the NASA?

You know that space computers are slow beasts, right?

but... high tech..... how could they....

Sergio Niggermountain, I somehow remember you to be a bit funnier and smarter.

Rulez wrote:Sergio Niggermountain, I somehow remember you to be a bit funnier and smarter.

And I remember you drawing better and having a clever humour sense. Oh wait, I don't.

sergiomonty wrote:

Rulez wrote:Sergio Niggermountain, I somehow remember you to be a bit funnier and smarter.

And I remember you drawing better and having a clever humour sense. Oh wait, I don't.

No offense taken.

Rulez wrote: No offense taken.

Neither here. We're fine, bro.

This is how arguments between friends should go. Now to explain that to that jealous faggot ex-friend of mine that I think I told you (or Jason) about.

To elaborate on NASA computers: our fancy microprocessors work well because of that giant cover thing called atmosphere, which bounces off 99,99999999% of random rays and particles rushing through the space. Those things may literally flip the data in modern processor due to everything being so small, so "retro" ones are used in space as they are less prone to this type of error. Scientists considered shielding space stations for various reasons; with 2005 tech and theoretically unlimited money supply, they settled for either 400 meters thick sphere of water-like fluid that would just work or a 300 meters thick one which would require "recharging". This is a little heavy. So, well, NASA computers are weaker than Wii.

I didn't know this is the NASA topic.

It is an inevitability that threads will go off-topic, particularly these main ones, and it appears that the mods are OK with that, they haven't had problems with this thing in the past, only when things have gotten way out of hand have they intervened.

stan423321 wrote:To elaborate on NASA computers: our fancy microprocessors work well because of that giant cover thing called atmosphere, which bounces off 99,99999999% of random rays and particles rushing through the space. Those things may literally flip the data in modern processor due to everything being so small, so "retro" ones are used in space as they are less prone to this type of error. Scientists considered shielding space stations for various reasons; with 2005 tech and theoretically unlimited money supply, they settled for either 400 meters thick sphere of water-like fluid that would just work or a 300 meters thick one which would require "recharging". This is a little heavy. So, well, NASA computers are weaker than Wii.

Well... then, If NASA computers aren't a good example... Hmm... well I don't know, Obama's laptop, whatever, just imagine a powerful computer, that's the idea.