Rayfist wrote:emshomar wrote:Rayfist wrote:emshomar wrote:The Playstation 2 can already play play PS1 games, so why wasting more money?
It's nice to collect.
You know I'm collecting exclusive only Rayman Games, don't you? It has a big meaning to me!
I collect Rayman stuff and games, mostly Rayman but oldschool gaming stuff is great as well, it's a nice thing to have.
I'm a bit of a Rayman collector myself. But, in general, I collect DVDs of movies and shows, games, music (CDs, cassettes, and vinyl), and band shirts (yeah, kind of. I'm a big music nerd).
emshomar wrote:I had a black PS3 160GB (no idea if slim or not) before. I know that it can't play PS2 games but PS1. I really want a console that plays PS1. PS2 and PS3 games. But I heard that the 60GB modell has YLOD issues and I fear that if I buy one it could fail within days D:
*Damn I lost all my consoles (Black Nintendo DS Lite, Black Nintendo 3DS, Black PS2, Black PS3 160GB 'no racist/i just like black') because of my shitty uber priced notebook >:( *
Do you remember what year you got it? It could be either one. I'm pretty sure mine's also a 160GB model, and it's a slim. So far I've had it for maybe two years? And the funny part is that I only have four PS3 games. PS3's fine, but I'd rather stick with PS1 and 2. I don't even have a PS1 anymore - I just play my PS1 games on the PS2 and 3. I used to pay it on 3 always, because it smooths the rendering of PS1 games, but now I usually play it on 2 because it's quicker to plop it in the second one and just play; there's also a nostalgia to it if you play a PS1 game on a PS2 because PS2 controllers are wired. Oh, and the PS2 also smooths PS1 games a bit but it's not really noticeable - I don't give a fuck anyways.
.
