Re: Rayman 1
Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:54 am
Emulators are your friends
I agree with Master.Master wrote:They may be, but nothing beats the satisfaction of authentic hardware.
Do you have at least a working PS3 or PS2? Original PlayStation 2 and 3 are backwards compatible to PS1.Bradandez wrote:I had no working PS1.
Nope this house has been PlayStation free since '05.emshomar wrote:Do you have at least a working PS3 or PS2? Original PlayStation 2 and 3 are backwards compatible to PS1.Bradandez wrote:I had no working PS1.
Bradandez wrote:I still don't trust emulators that require more than just downloading and installing the emulator program.
I agree with Master too but Emulators are still a good alternative. And I think its silly not to trust them expecially since many people use them including Haruka who recorded her Walkthroughs thanks to emulators.Bradandez wrote:I agree with Master.
I don't like emulators, because you have to set it up, tweak it, blablabla. And then you'll have to expect glitches and errors, like in the SSF emulator the timing glitch or that glitch below:OldClassicGamer wrote:Bradandez wrote:I still don't trust emulators that require more than just downloading and installing the emulator program.I agree with Master too but Emulators are still a good alternative. And I think its silly not to trust them expecially since many people use them including Haruka who recorded her Walkthroughs thanks to emulators.Bradandez wrote:I agree with Master.
http://puu.sh/4CeGT.jpgKeane wrote:Oh God the password system. I had a whole sheet written full of them.
That glitch never happened to meemshomar wrote:I don't like emulators, because you have to set it up, tweak it, blablabla. And then you'll have to expect glitches and errors, like in the SSF emulator the timing glitch or that glitch below:OldClassicGamer wrote:Bradandez wrote:I still don't trust emulators that require more than just downloading and installing the emulator program.I agree with Master too but Emulators are still a good alternative. And I think its silly not to trust them expecially since many people use them including Haruka who recorded her Walkthroughs thanks to emulators.Bradandez wrote:I agree with Master.
Well it was just an example. It also never happened to me.OldClassicGamer wrote:That glitch never happened to me
I honestly hate emulators; I just use them when there's a game I want to play that I don't have a console for. (For instance, I wanted to try out the Jaguar version of Rayman, since there's no way in hell I'm going to invest in a real Atari Jaguar.) The only ones that I find decent are XEBRA and DOSBox, and with XEBRA I still get broken audio interpolation, and with DOSBox I still get framerate issues.OldClassicGamer wrote:I agree with Master too but Emulators are still a good alternative. And I think its silly not to trust them expecially since many people use them including Haruka who recorded her Walkthroughs thanks to emulators.
Nobody in here could invest in a Jaguar, knowing how rare and costy are (especially for just one game).technology4617 wrote:I honestly hate emulators; I just use them when there's a game I want to play that I don't have a console for. (For instance, I wanted to try out the Jaguar version of Rayman, since there's no way in hell I'm going to invest in a real Atari Jaguar.) The only ones that I find decent are XEBRA and DOSBox, and with XEBRA I still get broken audio interpolation, and with DOSBox I still get framerate issues.OldClassicGamer wrote:I agree with Master too but Emulators are still a good alternative. And I think its silly not to trust them expecially since many people use them including Haruka who recorded her Walkthroughs thanks to emulators.
I'm just going to go out on a limb here, and say that I think Haruka should invest in a DVD recorder or capture card, since, while the gameplay in her videos is very good, I'm getting a little tired of seeing severe and annoying emulation glitches in her videos (such as ePSXe's wonderful audio spazzouts). I still really like her videos, though. I actually restarted my Conker walkthrough when I got a real N64, since I got tired of the emulation bugs.
If you can get your hands on the actual hardware, that's always the best option. If not, then you can use emulators as a mediocre alternative.
That really sucks. My parents let me get whatever I want, as long as I have the money to back it up. Do you have any vintage gaming stores near where you live? You can get consoles from there. Where I am we have a chain of stores called Pink Gorilla, and they're great little stores where I can drool over used Nintendo consoles and games.[/quote]Haruka wrote:I would invest in a capture device if they weren't so costy, but that isn't just the only issue. There are consoles I would really like to own for real, but my parents would chop my head away if a mailman was knocking at our door bringing a new game console, especially now that I started university studies. Maybe in a few years I can manage to do so, but for now it is useless. I also don't think that opening a donation PayPal account would solve anything.
I don't even WANT one! As far as I know, there are only two decent games for it!Haruka wrote:Nobody in here could invest in a Jaguar, knowing how rare and costy are (especially for just one game).
*facepalm* I'm not wasting money on a bad console just so I can play one game.emshomar wrote:Hoodcom has the Jaguar with Rayman.
Thank you!Master wrote:You misunderstand, Em is merely pointing out that one of the members here owns it.
I know, but it annoys me that people would buy a bad console just for one good game. This is when emulators are meant to be used. I know I sound like a dick for insulting another member's console, but the Jaguar is universally recognized as an ungodly abomination that should never have seen the light of day. It IS a terrible console.Master wrote:You misunderstand, Em is merely pointing out that one of the members here owns it.