Re: Rayman 2
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:22 am
You mean you just found out about the map?
I'm not "posting just to gain tings". I'm just trying to start a conversation.Keane wrote:Stop posting just to gain tings.
I'm making a good point. These questions just have that "I need to say something" feeling all over it. I looked through my old posts a while back, they have that too. Then I reached puberty.Adsolution wrote:Maybe you should do the same.
RR is shorter than R2, what disappointed me a bit. I felt like Ubi replaced some stuff instead of adding it to the original version on N64 and PC. Btw maybe a conversation already occured about the differences between the two versions of the game (sorry but I'm too lazy to read more than 4000 commentsAdsolution wrote:I just picked up a copy of Rayman Revolution. Having never actually beat it before (I've only played it on an emulator, twice actually, both times accidentally breaking my saved games), I'll get to experience this as soon as I can get my PS2 hooked up.
Making you deliriously think that you have actually improved. You telling him he's posting just to gain tings twice with no other substance whatsoever is also, by your definition, posting just to gain tings.Keane wrote:Then I reached puberty.
Wut? Are you getting your versions right? The PlayStation 1 version only has 800 lums, I'm quite sure that Revolution has a thousand.saerleiya wrote:200 less lums, some worlds which doesn't appear anymore, Whale Bay and Sanctuary of Water and Ice in one world. mmh...
With "when I came here", I meant "when I joined the RPC", which a while back.Minor-T5 wrote:You mean you just found out about the map?
Thank you, Ad. You were first than me.Adsolution wrote:Maybe you should do the same.
Good luck! I find Rayman Revolution to be particularly good when it comes to double the longevity and yet trying to create physical level connections.Adsolution wrote:I just picked up a copy of Rayman Revolution. Having never actually beat it before (I've only played it on an emulator, twice actually, both times accidentally breaking my saved games), I'll get to experience this as soon as I can get my PS2 hooked up.
I don't know what's your problem because Minor-T5 is... well, a minor. I don't see anything wrong in the questions but good to see your need to show that you are a grown up.Keane wrote: I'm making a good point. These questions just have that "I need to say something" feeling all over it. I looked through my old posts a while back, they have that too. Then I reached puberty.
I was about to say "what the hell" because RR has got the double of the longevity of the classical versions. Someone who knows the game by heart, finishes RR in 8 hours, being 4 hours in the classical versions.saerleiya wrote:
RR is shorter than R2, what disappointed me a bit. I felt like Ubi replaced some stuff instead of adding it to the original version on N64 and PC. Btw maybe a conversation already occured about the differences between the two versions of the game (sorry but I'm too lazy to read more than 4000 comments).
200 less lums, some worlds which doesn't appear anymore, Whale Bay and Sanctuary of Water and Ice in one world. mmh...
saerleiya wrote:Oh sorry I was talking about the PS1 version. My bad. Don't be damned.
Howerver the PS1 version is older than the PC one. I guess they only ported it to the PS1 some months (or years) after...
Do you mean newer? If I recall correctly, the PC version was released in 1999, while the PS1 version was released in 2000.saerleiya wrote:Oh sorry I was talking about the PS1 version. My bad. Don't be damned.
Howerver the PS1 version is older than the PC one. I guess they only ported it to the PS1 some months (or years) after...
Excuses...Keane wrote: Then I reached puberty.
The PC version was released in 1999 in the United States, and in Europe, it was released in 2001.Master4lyf1 wrote:Do you mean newer? If I recall correctly, the PC version was released in 1999, while the PS1 version was released in 2000.