Jman's signature shop

[Xenon]

The loading time is faster, and it supports most of the images in PC. It's worth getting.

[Hunchman801]

Just try it, and you'll understand why ^^

[Xenon]

Speaking of which, is anyone making the remaining PC buttons? (The quote, edit, etc)

[Jman]

I will got on them done after I finish my large list of signatures to make for all the sigs.

[Matyuv]

oh yea the buttons

LOL

[Jman]

Oh yeah, I asked you to make me a sig a while ago.

[Matyuv]

o_0

[Beebop]

It has been a very long while that we have been waiting for the Buttons. I think it must nearly a year now.

[Xenon]

They look even worse in older browsers
Were they defaulted?

[Jman]

They look fine to me.

[Xenon]

I'm talking about older versions. Like the old IEs. My other computer uses a lower version of IE and makes PC (and its buttons) look awful.

[Jman]

Why don't you use firefox.

[Xenon]

I am using Firefox, but my old computer isn't.

[Hunchman801]

Former versions of IE didn't support PNG transparency, which is not our problem to be honest

[Holy Crap]

it doesn't really look that bad. this computer only has IE6. as i explained to xenon somewhere else, i'm actually quite use to it looking like this, and it looks wierd to me on IE7 and firefox.

[Xenon]

I don't see how you prefer that look, but whatever floats your boat I suppose.

[Holy Crap]

it's just that i'm more used to it, seeing as most of the computers i use have IE6.

[Hunchman801]

The only real difference must be the white backgrounds you see behind every PNG image.

[Holy Crap]

basically. there are white corners all over the place.

[Jman]

You need to get used to no white corners.