Re: Of the extermination of furfags
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 5:06 pm
Now do you see where your beloved ‘tolerance’ is leading our society?
What meaningful differences do you perceive between ‘tolerating’ fetishes for overweight anthropomorphic animals and ‘condoning’ fetishes for overweight anthropomorphic animals? Indifference is just as bad as acceptance; both allow these sick pracices to continue unabated.MLII wrote:Tolerance =/= condoning fetishes for overweight anthropomorphic animals
Just saying
I was tired when I wrote that and so I didn't notice it at the time. 'Tis probably my mild Dyslexia acting up too. I'll fix that right away.RayFan9876 wrote:Once you're aware of this particular grammatical fallacy, you can't imagine how you could have ever made the mistake before - it's that blatantly obvious.The Edditaur wrote:Surely if this defacing were real I would've thought that Anon may have publicly said something about it instead of posting on the actual forum that it was going to happen on.
...Because it is a mental disability. And I don't really have bad spelling at all, it's more of the phrasing that I get confused with.spiraldoor wrote:Dyslexia is just bad spelling. Why do people feel the need to describe all of their shortcomings as medical conditions?
I meant tolerance in general as opposed to tolerance of that one thing. n.nspiraldoor wrote: What meaningful differences do you perceive between ‘tolerating’ fetishes for overweight anthropomorphic animals and ‘condoning’ fetishes for overweight anthropomorphic animals? Indifference is just as bad as acceptance; both allow these sick practices to continue unabated.
spiraldoor wrote:Dyslexia is just bad spelling.
Wait, there are people who blame things on Autism? That actually kind of offends me.MLII wrote:spiraldoor wrote:Dyslexia is just bad spelling.
While I admit that there are people online who blame their bad grammar on dyslexia there are also people who genuinely have it. Kind of like autism.
Making spelling mistakes from time to time does not make you mentally disabled.The Edditaur wrote:...Because it is a mental disability. And I don't really have bad spelling at all, it's more of the phrasing that I get confused with.
Tolerating deviant behaviour will encourage greater deviations. You can’t pick a specific practice to disapprove of and then tolerate all of the behavioural variations which lie between it and normalcy.MLII wrote:I meant tolerance in general as opposed to tolerance of that one thing. n.n
What is the difference and why should it matter?MLII wrote:While I admit that there are people online who blame their bad grammar on dyslexia there are also people who genuinely have it. Kind of like autism.
...I have been diagnosed with a very mild Dyslexia. And I don't make spelling mistakes, I make grammatical errors, in which I end up not knowing how to phrase things and then usually end up getting called out on said things. I also think I may be starting to take this a bit too seriously. Chill Edd, calm yourself. Have some lemonade or something, I don't know.spiraldoor wrote:Making spelling mistakes from time to time does not make you mentally disabled.The Edditaur wrote:...Because it is a mental disability. And I don't really have bad spelling at all, it's more of the phrasing that I get confused with.
Eh, I'm too tired to continue this argument. You can say what you want Spiral, but I know that I'm dyslexic. So, agree to disagree I guess.spiraldoor wrote:Virtually everyone makes grammatical errors from time to time. I think it’s ridiculous to diagnose this as an illness.
I hav disleksia ant wut is dis?spiraldoor wrote:Dyslexia is just bad spelling. Why do people feel the need to describe all of their shortcomings as medical conditions?
Oui. Even Chris-Chan's actions weren't what made it so unwatchable to me, it's who he is in combination with that action.Cairnie wrote:Finally caught up with that video and I hardly find it shocking to be honest (a more unwatchable video would be Chris Chan's inflatable anime love doll one, the one where he's actually naked and stuff), that's plushophilia and it isn't even strictly a furry thing as is adult baby/diaper lover and so forth. (yes I am aware he tagged it with furry but I can't even view the rest of his channel so who knows)
Just sayin.
No wonder why I prefer to ignore this thread.Hunchman801 wrote:The more I learn about furfags, the less I want to.