Page 32 of 76

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:57 pm
by Haruka
This question could have been made in the emulation thread. It isn't better to merge this topic to the one I've refered?

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:00 pm
by Fifo
emshomar wrote:
Fifo wrote:BTW Saturn games cannot be played on a PS1.
My bad, I picked the wrong link.
http://www.ebay.de/itm/Sega-Saturn-Kons ... 20d9daa2bf
Thanks for the Saturn link!
emshomar wrote:
Fifo wrote:I had a PS1 when I was a kid and I had Rayman 2 for it. :)
I only had the SNES then the controller broke and the PS2 came next. It was like a huge jump to something simply better. I really enjoyed the EyeToy until I lost it but I found it again some days ago. The game disc itself wasn't found yet but at least I can download an ISO of the games and burn them on DVD.
Do you have a modchip soldered in your PS2?
emshomar wrote:
Fifo wrote:Found the original Rayman 1 disc for a PS1!
Great, I destroyed 2 Rayman 1 discs for PS1 and 3 Rayman 1 discs PC. One of that worthless Platinum resale and a rare gray PS1 discs. For the PC versions I destroeyed one original yellow disc and 2 worthless Gold Games resale.
Why did you destroy the discs!? BTW I've got Rayman 1 running on my Mac by using your Mega patch.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:02 pm
by OCG
@Haruka
He was new so he didn't know. I guess Master can merge it.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:05 pm
by Snagglebee
Fifo wrote:Do you have a modchip soldered in your PS2?
My very first one, no.
My second one from Iran, yes. All PS2 there are sold with already installed modchip.
My third one, no.
My fourth one, yes. The preuser/s appearently sent it to a company who has done the mod.
Fifo wrote:Why did you destroy the discs!? BTW I've got Rayman 1 running on my Mac by using your Mega patch.
Because I was very young (~3-4 years old) and I literally didn't destroyed them but because of my bad treating it got too scratched to be read fine ----> trash.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:12 pm
by Haruka
@OCG Tell me something I don't know. And besides, I was suggesting this to the moderators, not aiming this to Fifo.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:21 pm
by Fifo
emshomar wrote:
Fifo wrote:Do you have a modchip soldered in your PS2?
My very first one, no.
My second one from Iran, yes. All PS2 there are sold with the modchip already installed.
Ok.
emshomar wrote:
Fifo wrote:Why did you destroy the discs!? BTW I've got Rayman 1 running on my Mac by using your Mega patch.
Because I was very young (~3-4 years old) and I literally didn't destroy them but because of my bad treating it got too scratched to be read fine ----> trash.
Ok.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:01 pm
by Fifo
Haruka wrote:This question could have been made in the emulation thread. Isn't it better to merge this topic to the one I've referred?
You've made a mistake: "refered". It should be "referred".
Also: "It isn't better...". It should be "Isn't it better..."

All the corrections are in the quoted text.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:49 pm
by Haruka
:| And by your information, writting one post just to say "OK" is something that might not be taken nicely by the mods, plus the double posting you've done when the edit button is in the board for a reason. I've edited the mistakes before but I've checked the post and for some reason the fixes weren't saved. "Thanks" for the grammar lesson, I guess?...

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:53 pm
by OCG
Fifo wrote:
Haruka wrote:This question could have been made in the emulation thread. Isn't it better to merge this topic to the one I've referred?
You've made a mistake: "refered". It should be "referred".
Also: "It isn't better...". It should be "Isn't it better..."

All the corrections are in the quoted text.
Image

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:57 pm
by Snagglebee
OldClassicGamer wrote:Image
:lol: You made my day OCG!

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:30 pm
by Master
Hm, I can be a bit of a Grammar Nazi meself at times, depending on how severe the error is, though I try not to be petty about it, and give conversation as opposed to just mere corrections.

Still, I do find it funny when wannabes try to correct others, yet their own spelling is hilariously wrong, cringeworthy, yet hilarious.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:33 pm
by Snagglebee
I have to follow the Grammar Nazis! I am just a student learning the great topic of grammar of the english language. HEIL GRAMMAR!

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:47 pm
by OCG
Master wrote:Hm, I can be a bit of a Grammar Nazi meself at times, depending on how severe the error is, though I try not to be petty about it, and give conversation as opposed to just mere corrections.

Still, I do find it funny when wannabes try to correct others, yet their own spelling is hilariously wrong, cringeworthy, yet hilarious.
Correction grammar at times is ok and I appreciate if someone corrects me, however Fifo's correction was hypocritical because just like Haruka said, he himself double posted and said just "Ok" couple of times. Plus grammar correction is not something newbies should be doing in my opinion.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:03 pm
by Fifo
Oh no, this thread is beginning to get big.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:21 pm
by Haruka
Fifo wrote:Oh no, this thread is beginning to get big.
Not wanting to sound rude, but are you being honest?

To clarify, while I don't mind people correcting me in the spelling, I found kinda innoportunate knowing that you created first a post to say "OK" and "OK" and right after you decide to create other followed post (double post) just because you remembered to fix my spelling. It feels awkward. Just that.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:29 pm
by Fifo
Haruka wrote:
Fifo wrote:Oh no, this thread is beginning to get big.
Not wanting to sound rude, but are you being honest?

To clarify, while I don't mind people correcting me in the spelling, I found kinda innoportunate knowing that you created first a post to say "OK" and "OK" and right after you decide to create other followed post (double post) just because you remembered to fix my spelling. It feels awkward. Just that.
I won’t try to say "OK" more.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:33 pm
by Haruka
You know, that does not reply to my question. If you want to ignore that's fine for me, I was only asking. Also, you can say "OK" as far as you have solid reasons to do so, or if you create a construtive post. I won't drag this further. Peace.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:35 pm
by Fifo
Mods, feel free to remove this topic.

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:41 pm
by Serza5
There's no real reason to remove this topic although as Haruka suggested maybe a merge with the Emulation topic would be most appropriate. That is if you agree?

Re: SSF problems

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:43 pm
by Cairnie
Agreed with Serza, we'll get this merged yeah?

Aaand it's merged with the Emulation thread. In future it may be wise to talk about emulation in general in here rather than off topic.