Page 311 of 931

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:15 pm
by Rulez
It would, yes.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:34 pm
by Minor-T5
Wait. Basically, there would be no Rayman if there was no Polokus. Polokus did put the Nymphs and Rayman and everything else in the Glade. But if there is no Polokus, there would be no Nymphs, which means no Betilla, which also means no Rayman. So there would be absolutely nothing :fou:
Am I wrong?

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:44 pm
by Rulez
So essentially, summing up your post "no Rayman = no Rayman"

I believe you're quite correct.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:46 pm
by Spanex
Minor-T5 wrote:Wait. Basically, there would be no Rayman if there was no Polokus. Polokus did put the Nymphs and Rayman and everything else in the Glade. But if there is no Polokus, there would be no Nymphs, which means no Betilla, which also means no Rayman. So there would be absolutely nothing :fou:
Am I wrong?
It's more like Polokus leaves the Glade forever rather than never having existed.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:50 pm
by Minor-T5
I know, but I'm just making a point.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:13 pm
by Xenon
Minor-T5 wrote:It would be sad to see Ancel leave Rayman :tssk:
Really, I couldn't imagine Rayman without him.
What makes you say this? He had little involvement in Rayman 3 but that turned out to be just as good as the previous games, and the developers still managed to incorporate the same Rayman magic.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:20 pm
by stan423321
R3 was, in my opinion, far, far more atmospheric than RO, so it's not like Ancel's presence guarantees certain traits of a game.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 6:24 pm
by Spanex
Xenon wrote:
Minor-T5 wrote:It would be sad to see Ancel leave Rayman :tssk:
Really, I couldn't imagine Rayman without him.
What makes you say this? He had little involvement in Rayman 3 but that turned out to be just as good as the previous games, and the developers still managed to incorporate the same Rayman magic.
Yet, the thought of Rayman without Michel scares me.

I'm a worrybutt.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:50 pm
by Haruka
Spanex wrote:
Xenon wrote:What makes you say this? He had little involvement in Rayman 3 but that turned out to be just as good as the previous games, and the developers still managed to incorporate the same Rayman magic.
Yet, the thought of Rayman without Michel scares me.

I'm a worrybutt.
^ This and ^^ this.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:54 pm
by TeensieKing
Xenon wrote:
Minor-T5 wrote:It would be sad to see Ancel leave Rayman :tssk:
Really, I couldn't imagine Rayman without him.
What makes you say this? He had little involvement in Rayman 3 but that turned out to be just as good as the previous games, and the developers still managed to incorporate the same Rayman magic.
No. Rayman 2 feels MUCH more magical, and is far better than Rayman 3. R3 is good, but R2 is simply uber.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:06 pm
by sergiomonty
I must be the only one around here that thinks that Origins was still a superb game... :(

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:12 pm
by Rulez
sergiomonty wrote:I must be the only one around here that thinks that Origins was still a superb game... :(
I think that too. :| and no one is denying that.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:30 pm
by Minor-T5
Rulez wrote:
sergiomonty wrote:I must be the only one around here that thinks that Origins was still a superb game... :(
I think that too. :| and no one is denying that.
You two aren't alone.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:01 pm
by El Dango
sergiomonty wrote:I must be the only one around here that thinks that Origins was still a superb game... :(
Oh, I think it's the tits! In my book it's up there wrestling with 2 over the title of champion, and it looks like Legends might join the match before it even has a chance to end!

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:04 pm
by darkkitty
sergiomonty wrote:I must be the only one around here that thinks that Origins was still a superb game... :(

it was very good but not as good as most rayman games :D

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:19 pm
by Master
As a gamer, I think Rayman Origins is a pretty darn good game, it's fun while it lasts and I don't mind dropping in when any of my siblings play.
My issues mostly lie with the Rayman side of things.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:22 pm
by darkkitty
yeah i don,t like the lack of interaction as well as the simple story :)

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:37 pm
by Haruka
For you having an idea, I beated RO at 100% three times and I don't feel interested for now to start it again. I also got tired of the co-op.

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:40 pm
by darkkitty
i got tired of it quickly again note i,m not as happy :)

Re: Rayman Legends

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:41 pm
by Rayfist
Haruka wrote:You're right, but as long Ubisoft wouldn't make Rayman to go to the same path as Crash Bandicoot and Spyro...
Oh god no, this would certainly be something to fear, but I have high hopes it'll never happen.

Edit: Origins certainly was a superb game, however as Haruka said after 2-3 100% playthroughs, the game gets tiring, it's a fun game, I can still play it, but I don't think it matches up towards the original trilogy.