Re: Rayman Origins
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:55 pm
Your life is not relevantsergiomonty wrote: so your observation is not relevant.
Of course, but as I said: as long as it looks the same way as on my computer, I'm fine with it. Besides, I'm gonna get an XBox soon, so it really doesn't matter.spiraldoor wrote:No, the Wii version will look less blurry and more jagged. But good for you if you find that satisfactory.iambored2006 wrote:The Wii version ain't gonna look like that, no siree. It's gonna look way less blurry, and besides, if I can see the game on the Wii the same way I see it on the computer, I'm not complaining.
Dude, he's not "speaking like a sir" to sound less offensive. He speaks "like a sir" because, well, it's better. He never rages and his arguments make sense, and I think that's what's bugging you.sergiomonty wrote:Your life is not relevantsergiomonty wrote: so your observation is not relevant.
Nah, just kidding. No, but seriously, speaking "like a sir" doesn't help you, you are still kinda offensive, pal. Also, you're despicing the capabilities of the wii. What about Wario Land Shake it, for example? and Wario Ware Smooth Moves? come on, dude, wii is not THAT bad.
Oh god, World Map! I was already missing the map.
if it is mr.dark....Mr. Dark Thingamajig wrote:The Magician and Mr. Dark in one DB
Holy shite, English voice acting! Did not expect that lol.
AWESOME WORLD MAP!!!
Did you notice any slowdowns with more than 1 player? Shouldn't be any in a presentation, just asking.Cairnie wrote:I'm on my mobile so please excuse my crappy texting. I had another crack at it and it plays much better in 1 player mode that's for sure.
Yes it will. Basic calculations are enough to see that there are five times as many pixels as in the native Wii resolution in full HD.iambored2006 wrote:The Wii version ain't gonna look like that, no siree.
As I said above, the difference will be huge. I'm not saying that the Wii version will be ugly (certainly not), but what's the point in criticising HD when the graphics are clearly one of the greatest attributes of the game?sergiomonty wrote:If the Wii version and the HD versions are equal, then I'll laught. Maybe there will be small quality differences, but that's not the big deal, it's like watching a youtube video without HD, you can see clearly everything and enjoy it.
Firstly, I meant it won't be as blurry. Secondly, we're always comparing to the best versions we have, but we can't even see them in HD! I mean, the Wii version will probably look like the best version we have of screenshots from the game, unless you're using HD screens.Hunchman801 wrote:Yes it will. Basic calculations are enough to see that there are five times as many pixels as in the native Wii resolution in full HD.iambored2006 wrote:The Wii version ain't gonna look like that, no siree.
As I said above, the difference will be huge. I'm not saying that the Wii version will be ugly (certainly not), but what's the point in criticising HD when the graphics are clearly one of the greatest attributes of the game?sergiomonty wrote:If the Wii version and the HD versions are equal, then I'll laught. Maybe there will be small quality differences, but that's not the big deal, it's like watching a youtube video without HD, you can see clearly everything and enjoy it.
I wrote in that manner when I was fourteen. Thankfully RaymanZone was completely destroyed, leaving no trace of my earliest, stupidest posts.iambored2006 wrote:BTW, I gotta say something: this forum has inspired me to stop writing like a douche (especially you, spiral). Usually, I would've written "u" and "r" instead of "you" and "are". I also used to never use capitals or apostrophes. Thank you, PC!