Page 38 of 152
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:30 pm
by spiraldoor
Holy Crap wrote:Sabertooth1000000000 wrote:
Funny, I knew I'd get a reply like this. Fine, but there were some good ones. Steelix, the Eeveelutions, maybe Mamoswine (looked way better than its pre-evolutions, at any rate), Electivire, Gallade.
I'll agree on Steelix, Electivire and Gallade. But the Eeveelutions since the originals aren't that great, especially the most recent, and Mamoswines whole family sucks really. There are a couple of cool ones, but I'd really prefer a new original pokemon than an evolution of an old one, especially whenj they hove some retarded new evolution mechanism like level up in this particular place or with this particular attack.
Scizor is another exception of course, although Scyther is cool too, they're about even really.
I actually prefer the concept of granting new evolutions to old Pokémon – seeing the old Pokémon I remember from my childhood given this sort of treatment interests me far more than any of the brand-new Pokémon (about most of which I couldn’t care less). The problem lies in the execution of these ideas – the retroactive evolutions have a tendency to be crap. I think the additions by which I was most offended were Magmortar, Electivire and Togekiss.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:43 pm
by Haruka
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 6:51 pm
by Rsandee
Electrivire and Togekiss are good enough, Magmortar is shit... just like Magmar and Magby.
I don't really like fire ducks.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:09 pm
by Serza5
Dah what a bump but a pretty darn interesting one too.
Mr Masuda has announced that he's going to reveal a big surprise this weekend :
http://uk.ds.ign.com/articles/121/1219398p1.html
Who knows what it could be but i'd be pissed if it was a 3DS release, if it's a 3rd gen remake it might make me get one.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:21 pm
by Adsolution
I honestly wish that they would make another game along the lines of Colosseum and Gale Of Darkness, but much more expansive. If by a slim chance that's what the announcement is about, then I'll be interested.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:26 pm
by Haruka
I'm looking forward for that.
I'm almost certain it is a 3rd version of the 5th PKMN generation (PKMN Gray).
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:36 pm
by Rayfist
RayFan9876 wrote:I honestly wish that they would make another game along the lines of Colosseum and Gale Of Darkness, but much more expansive. If by a slim chance that's what the announcement is about, then I'll be interested.
This^
I beat XD gate of darkness long ago, and it was god damn fun, a new on similar to it, perhaps with the 3ds or Wii would be wonderful.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:18 pm
by Serza5
Something i'd love to see is a gameboy/ds game (Like Red, gold, emerald etc) on a console with the graphics of Battle Revolution.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:21 pm
by ikke471
Serza5 wrote:Something i'd love to see is a gameboy/ds game (Like Red, gold, emerald etc) on a console with the graphics of Battle Revolution.
but if they do that it will surely be on 3DS... and then you will be like: FUUUUU and me (and the other 3DS owners): U MAD?
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:50 pm
by Serza5
I was referring to non-handheld consoles.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:00 pm
by ikke471
Oh oops I read it vice versa XD
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:36 pm
by Serza5
But yeah (Heart) Gold/(Soul) Silver/Crystal in 3D = Do want.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:55 pm
by ikke471
Serza5 wrote:But yeah (Heart) Gold/(Soul) Silver/Crystal in 3D = Do want.
I 100% agree those games where part of my childhood just like rayman (that's why I loved heart and soul)
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:37 am
by Sabertooth
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:52 am
by Haruka
Not expecting this. Then does this means there won't be a 3rd version of Gen V? I'm disappointed.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:18 am
by Rayfist
Why must they make a 2ND Pokemon Black and White? I just don't understand... who would see this coming at all? I just find it uneccesary, Nintendo could have took the time to at least think it all out and make the next generation for the 3DS, BUT WHY THIS!? I just find it not needed. Ah, well within the first week the game comes out I'll probably be buying it, depending on price.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:36 am
by DesLife
Rayfist wrote:WHY THIS!? I just find it not needed. Ah, well within the first week the game comes out I'll probably be buying it.
I fail to understand your logic.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:37 am
by Sabertooth
This is no more unnecessary than a third version of the originals. Would you seriously rather have an updated re-release over a full-fledged sequel (assuming this is one)?
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:47 am
by Adsolution
What a real shocker.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:56 am
by Sabertooth
RayFan9876 wrote:What a real shocker.
Can't tell if sarcasm...
