Rayman Pirate-Community

Yeah Dart, enter that you already got my vote tbh

So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?

Master wrote:

Dart wrote:They'd be too chaotic if we did as we please, like I could post this as a signiture:

Make it into a signature with valid dimensions and you'll get my vote.

@Tomazo: Ah but if that was the theme then someone else might enter something even better!

All stereotypes considered, I would DEFINITELY win rather unfairly if that were the theme and if I entered.
Hm... I'm kind of debating entering right now... it's obviously not too late to go make some last minute tweaks if I decide on it, right?

Tunderous wrote:

Serza5 wrote:You can try reading the rules on the size limit is what you can do.

Alright, I changed it.

You can try reading the minimum size now.

Shadowrayman wrote:

Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.

Why do we have to make the signatures 285 x 750 px can't we just leave the sig size how it is because why does it matter? Can't we just do what we want?

I completely forgot that this was the "Enter whatever image you want" contest instead of a "Enter a signature" contest. :boon: How dumb of me!

nr0r wrote:All stereotypes considered, I would DEFINITELY win rather unfairly if that were the theme and if I entered.
Hm... I'm kind of debating entering right now... it's obviously not too late to go make some last minute tweaks if I decide on it, right?

As long as it's within the rules and before the deadline you can enter whatever, whenever you want. There's also no stopping you from editting your sig midway through submission if you wanted to add something else to it or fix something.

I don't know if you caught this before, Serza. I'll just put it here again just to be sure.

Master wrote:So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?

Master wrote:

PluMGMK wrote:@Tomazo: Ah but if that was the theme then someone else might enter something even better!

Seems like everyone has so many ideas for this theme, so we can think of it as next SOTM theme already confirmed.

Master wrote:I don't know if you caught this before, Serza. I'll just put it here again just to be sure.

Master wrote:So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?

Master wrote:

I did, my mind blanked from doing too much shit at once, I got this though.

As for themes we do special ones quad monthly and March would be the time we have an official theme up. That said i'd need something more simple than "Hidden Satanist Meanings in Video Games" since overly specific themes like that are a disaster for turn outs, but if we could think of something related but on a broader spectrum we could go with that and you can submit those specific sigs in that.

Dart wrote:They'd be too chaotic if we did as we please, like I could post this as a signiture:

and probably win too...

nr0r wrote:That would honestly be a lovey signature and should be incorporated into one in the near future.

Tomazo wrote: SOTM #92: Hidden Satanist Meanings in Video Games
I will definitely vote for you Dart.

Tunderous wrote:same

Hunchman801 wrote:Make it into a signature with valid dimensions and you'll get my vote.

It is done!

Wonderful! It looks as good as we all had hoped.

wonderful

Now we're talking!

Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.

What's wrong with big signatures? Why is this forum so strict with everything?

750 px:

#Rubber mark# wrote:

Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.

What's wrong with big signatures? Why is this forum so strict with everything?

750 px:
rubbersig-750.jpeg

I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.

nr0r wrote:I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.

I think Rubber mark didn't mean it seriously, if you read back some pages here, you will surely understand.

Tomazo wrote:

nr0r wrote:I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.

I think Rubber mark didn't mean it seriously, if you read back some pages here, you will surely understand.

Simple misunderstanding and I'm not about to read up on a bunch of pages for nothing.

The size limits are in place as a way to differentiate a "sig" from being just "a regular picture only there's a bit of text with your name on it". It's also a fine guideline on what would be considered too big for general forum viewing.

Serza5 wrote:The size limits are in place as a way to differentiate a "sig" from being just "a regular picture only there's a bit of text with your name on it". It's also a fine guideline on what would be considered too big for general forum viewing.

Hey yeah that makes sense.

nr0r wrote:Simple misunderstanding and I'm not about to read up on a bunch of pages for nothing.

I just meant he was joking.