Rayman Pirate-Community

Serza5 wrote:I don't think I need more of an explanation other than a vote for hunch means a better ass for France.

Yeah, if stronger is better.

Yes, but is it strong and stable?

Even so this conversation is getting a bit silly for being in the SOTM thread.

Hunchman801 wrote:

Serza5 wrote:I don't think I need more of an explanation other than a vote for hunch means a better ass for France.

Yeah, if stronger is better.

Serza5 wrote:Even so this conversation is getting a bit silly for being in the SOTM thread.

Well it has been a long ass day today, and it's probably as long as Hunchman's at that.

That post meant "Maybe it's time to go back to talking about signatures/entering SOTM" ya numpty.

Serza5 wrote:That post meant "Maybe it's time to go back to talking about signatures/entering SOTM" ya numpty.

And your point?

I was responding to your post about the conversation was getting silly by stating it was a long day in response, while including one last joke on the matter.

ANYWAY

There's one week left until the deadline! Anyone want to submit a sig?

Here's an edited version of my current sig.

The text is still a little hard to read but those are nice additions.

Here's my entry :



Harpic made this for me so we can share the Tings if I win.

I very much doubt that it's within the size limitations.

Hunchman801 wrote:I very much doubt that it's within the size limitations.

The global economic cost of lost work productivity due to people with poor vision has been estimated at 700 billion dollars a year.
Refractive error, which eyeglasses correct, is the number one cause of vision impairment in the world.
It is also the second greatest cause of preventable blindness.
6 out of 10 people in the developed world wear glasses, contact lenses, or have had corrective eye surgery.
6 out of 10 people in the developing world are also vision impaired, but have little or no access to eye care or eyeglasses.
In North America, the ratio of optometrists to people is approximately 1: 6,000.
In sub-Saharan Africa, the ratio of optometrists to people is approximately 1: 8,000,000.
In Malawi, Africa, one of the poorest countries on earth, the ratio of ophthalmologists (surgeons able to perform cataract surgery) to people is 4: 15,000,000.

Hunchman801 wrote:I very much doubt that it's within the size limitations.

You'd be suprised to know that the size is 350 x 285 px which is very much within the size limits.

Hoodcom wrote:

Hunchman801 wrote:I'll let Lovy explain what he meant.

He better have a perfectly good explanation on that then.

Let's analyse this masterpiece.

Le Pen's presidential slogan at one point was "Pour une france forte", ie: "For a strong France". And because of Hunchman's firm yet tasty, gaping and unlubed piece of ass, and also because of his ability to fart once a minute while on skype, I thought that the following catchphrase would suit him more : "Pour une france forte du cul", ie: "For a France which is strong from the ass".

Serza5 wrote:You'd be suprised to know that the size is 350 x 285 px which is very much within the size limits.

She's obviously edited it since I posted my message, it almost took the whole screen.

LoveMetal wrote:Let's analyse this masterpiece.

[...]

LoveMetal wrote:

Hoodcom wrote:

Hunchman801 wrote:I'll let Lovy explain what he meant.

He better have a perfectly good explanation on that then.

Let's analyse this masterpiece.

Le Pen's presidential slogan at one point was "Pour une france forte", ie: "For a strong France". And because of Hunchman's firm yet tasty, gaping and unlubed piece of ass, and also because of his ability to fart once a minute while on skype, I thought that the following catchphrase would suit him more : "Pour une france forte du cul", ie: "For a France which is strong from the ass".

This is beuatiful.

Lysol wrote:
Harpic made this for me so we can share the Tings if I win.

Damn I just noticed this part. That's a very questionable way to get one of Harpics sigs in the comp and i'm no sure if I should allow that.

Serza5 wrote:Damn I just noticed this part. That's a very questionable way to get one of Harpics sigs in the comp and i'm no sure if I should allow that.

She asked me for a signature and I made her one. Is there a rule against members making signatures for other members? No, I don't think so. I'm OK with not winning any Tings on this one since I won two SOTM lately though.

Here's a reupload of the signature I should be allowed to enter since cubeupload seems to be down : https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/20 ... ngbird.png

Harpic fraîcheur wrote:

Serza5 wrote:Damn I just noticed this part. That's a very questionable way to get one of Harpics sigs in the comp and i'm no sure if I should allow that.

She asked me for a signature and I made her one. Is there a rule against members making signatures for other members? No, I don't think so. I'm OK with not winning any Tings on this one since I won two SOTM lately though.

I understand that you want to make lysol a sig to enter and there certainly is nothing against that. But the problem is that you have already won 2 times in a row and by having someone else enter a sig made by you it makes it look like a loophole in the rules is being taken advantage of just so there is a sig made by you in the contest even though it isn't you who entered. Again this is not trying to call you or lysol out for exposing this I'm just expressing my concern over this.

What would the advantage be for me if I do not get any Tings out of it?