Re: Rayman Origins
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 12:39 am
I'm going to stop reading, or watching anything that could contain spoilers.
Except Daily Bubbles.
Except Daily Bubbles.
There are many, many games for the serious gamer. Rayman just isn't one of them, and lets be honest, it hasn't been for well over a decade.Paradigm wrote:Sure, Rayman 1 had strong cartoon elements, but it was a pretty slow-paced and laid back game. Origins comes across as being more like a silly, fast-paced party game, where four friends can get together and mess about slapping each other until they get bored. Sadly this is a sign of the way the gaming industry is heading. There are no games for the serious gamer, or for gamers who enjoy difficult puzzle solving.
Well, everybody has different tastes. In my case, for example, well, I love LOVE LOVE in a practically sexual way Rayman Origins (ok, not that much, but close). The game is totally wacky and crazy, the music is childish and lunatic, and the graphics fit perfectly with the golden era of cartoons. I personally think this is a great step for rayman to attract new audiences.Paradigm wrote:I wish I hadn't watched those clips, because it's made me wonder whether this game is actually going to be any good or not.
Most of the music sounds over-the-top and annoying. I don't like the four-player thing, it just makes the levels look too frenetic and rushed.
Instead of a direct sequel/prequel to Rayman 1, it seems they have tried to blend the elements of Rayman 1 with the elements of the second & third games. This is a missed opportunity in my opinion, and a real let down for those of us who really wanted a proper 2D follow-up to the first game. Sorry to say that, but the only thing this game has in common with the first game is the fact that it's 2D. It's more like a 2D version of Rayman 3.
Sure, Rayman 1 had strong cartoon elements, but it was a pretty slow-paced and laid back game. Origins comes across as being more like a silly, fast-paced party game, where four friends can get together and mess about slapping each other until they get bored. Sadly this is a sign of the way the gaming industry is heading. There are no games for the serious gamer, or for gamers who enjoy difficult puzzle solving.
Rant over, here's hoping that I'll be proved wrong when I finally get to play the game...
Maybe, if they do another 2D Rayman game, it will be more serious. I guess the whole point of this game is to show a younger, less mature Rayman, who is a bit of a 'live wire' as it were. Still, it was painful to see the f**king gorgeous beta level of Rayman 2 in 2D and seeing what could have been. Sigh.sergiomonty wrote:Well, everybody has different tastes. In my case, for example, well, I love LOVE LOVE in a practically sexual way Rayman Origins (ok, not that much, but close). The game is totally wacky and crazy, the music is childish and lunatic, and the graphics fit perfectly with the golden era of cartoons. I personally think this is a great step for rayman to attract new audiences.Paradigm wrote:I wish I hadn't watched those clips, because it's made me wonder whether this game is actually going to be any good or not.
Most of the music sounds over-the-top and annoying. I don't like the four-player thing, it just makes the levels look too frenetic and rushed.
Instead of a direct sequel/prequel to Rayman 1, it seems they have tried to blend the elements of Rayman 1 with the elements of the second & third games. This is a missed opportunity in my opinion, and a real let down for those of us who really wanted a proper 2D follow-up to the first game. Sorry to say that, but the only thing this game has in common with the first game is the fact that it's 2D. It's more like a 2D version of Rayman 3.
Sure, Rayman 1 had strong cartoon elements, but it was a pretty slow-paced and laid back game. Origins comes across as being more like a silly, fast-paced party game, where four friends can get together and mess about slapping each other until they get bored. Sadly this is a sign of the way the gaming industry is heading. There are no games for the serious gamer, or for gamers who enjoy difficult puzzle solving.
Rant over, here's hoping that I'll be proved wrong when I finally get to play the game...
This game was intended for two kinds of people:
-Kids
-Grown-ups who are crazy as f*ck, like me!
Obviously, people that saw rayman as a character that was supposed to be "serious" and "badass" will be completely disappointed with this game, but that's the risk that Ubisoft decided to play.
Let's hope it was the case for Picture City then!spiraldoor wrote:I’m still not sure that it’s been removed. If they can figure out a way to fit a level composed of gigantic Electoons into the Jibberish Jungle, I’m sure they could find some way to include a pop art/pixel art level somewhere.
Same here.El Dango wrote:If that's the case, I hope it won't be as hard. Picture City is the reason I never finished the original.
It sounds fine to me. Most of the orchestral stuff (presumably the work of Christophe Héral) is excellent and unforgettable, as it should be. I don’t like the singing Lums, as they disrupt the atmosphere, but as a whole, the music sounds acceptable.Paradigm wrote:Most of the music sounds over-the-top and annoying.
Just enjoy the single-player mode, and be grateful that we don’t have mindless online competitive deathmatches.Paradigm wrote:I don't like the four-player thing, it just makes the levels look too frenetic and rushed.
Blending the first game with the sequels is the one thing that I’ve always really wanted them to do. I can forgive all its flaws based on this alone. I don’t mind that they’ve made significant gameplay changes, like the frantic pace or the ability to bounce off walls – I wouldn’t want the Rayman series to devolve into a Mario-style cycle of repetition where every game looks, feels and sounds the same. It’s never been like that.Paradigm wrote:Instead of a direct sequel/prequel to Rayman 1, it seems they have tried to blend the elements of Rayman 1 with the elements of the second & third games. This is a missed opportunity in my opinion, and a real let down for those of us who really wanted a proper 2D follow-up to the first game. Sorry to say that, but the only thing this game has in common with the first game is the fact that it's 2D. It's more like a 2D version of Rayman 3.
It took me a while to come to terms with the slapstick humour and cartoon style too. I would also like to play a game which is more restrained and ‘dignified’, like R1, but I’m perfectly willing to accept what we’ve been given, which is a complementary world-building project well beyond my most hopeful expectations.Paradigm wrote:Sure, Rayman 1 had strong cartoon elements, but it was a pretty slow-paced and laid back game. Origins comes across as being more like a silly, fast-paced party game, where four friends can get together and mess about slapping each other until they get bored. Sadly this is a sign of the way the gaming industry is heading. There are no games for the serious gamer, or for gamers who enjoy difficult puzzle solving.
Whenever I get the chance, I'd rather just play the single player mode.spiraldoor wrote:Just enjoy the single-player mode, and be grateful that we don’t have mindless online competitive deathmatches.Paradigm wrote:I don't like the four-player thing, it just makes the levels look too frenetic and rushed.