Page 452 of 1084

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:46 pm
by Limely
Hunchman801 wrote:Most people I know draw on paper and use a scanner.
I do too, but I wish I had a tablet so I could colour my drawings digitally once in a while. It's not fun to do it with a mouse.

Of course, personally I think traditional media pwns digital in every way, but it would be nice to be able to do something digital once in a while.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:54 pm
by RZ_Xeiqu
When you say traditional media pwns digital, do you mean it pwns it as much as Luckster pwnt RZ? I doubt it. She's a failure tbh.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:35 pm
by Limely
You don't go ahead and drag me into whatever squabble you guys have going. Personally I think you might think too little before you post, which is both irrational and childish. :?
Do you ever think about the fact that there is actually a person sitting behind the computer screen on the other side? It might just be the internetz, but that doesn't mean it's okay to go around and bash others and be cheeky. Venting your anger over the internet is not good. I learned that the hard way. I hope you realize that too, some day.
Normally I just ignore yours, and other peoples obviously-not-so-thought-trough messages, but when you directly refer to one of my posts while bashing, you cross my line.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:54 pm
by RZ_Xeiqu
I suggest you don't talk a former RaymanZone moderator like this. Everyone admits Luckster's a failure, and I'm sure you also think so. Isn't that what you told Nate by PM? We can ask him if you want!

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:11 pm
by Limely
That is well enough. I talk to whoever I want the way I want. If you are polite, I will be polite and nice back. If you act rude and angry, I will either ignore you or tell you what I think.
I have not talked to any Nate by pm about anything, as far as I know. Since the mass-deletion incident I have only sent one pm, and in it I did not mention anything on the subject you talk about. You go ahead and ask him, whoever he is.
I also suspect you answer like that to tick me off.
If it even was Lucksters fault, I am sure she did not do it on purpose, and I do not blame her or anyone else for what happened.
This discussion is best ended now, I think. I do not wish to quarrell with anyone.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:18 pm
by RZ_AntitoonNato
I'm AntitoonNato and I used to be a RZ moderator too, so you should take seriously what I say. A few hours after Luckster was hacked, you opened a private topic at RZ in which you invited all the previous RZ moderators and you told them you were fed up with the poor moderator Luckster was. We agree with you, but you have to be frank now ;)

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:20 pm
by timoo
I mean, LOL!

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:24 pm
by Limely
o_õ
I give up. If you are going to be childish and go ahead and throw around shit about me, you might as well do so, because none of what you say is true. I actually think you are quite a sad, pitiful lot.
And if you should somehow, mysteriously have any fake "evidence" or "screenshots" about this, I pity you even more for having so little to do you would actually go ahead and create something like that. It only proves you need to get out and get some fresh air, a real hobby, and forgive me for being rude, a new life.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:33 pm
by RZ_AntitoonNato
For I'm Nate, a very respected RZ moderator, I advise you not to laugh at us. You're being really rude and dishonest, and I can't understand how you can lie so well about what you told us. I can provide screenshots if you want.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:41 pm
by Limely
I can lie so well because I am not lying, you are. I have tried my best to not be rude, but if I have failed in that, well, to bad. And you are indeed quite laughable.
And as for the "screenshots", I've already said what I think about that. If you are going to sit and make a fake screenshot, good god, are you a sad bunch.

But I really think this conversation should quit now. If you further wish to quarrel with me, you may pm me. Don't expect an answer, though. We should not pollute the forum with this senseless, idiotic bickering.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:25 pm
by RZ_AntitoonNato
proof.jpg
:pfff:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:38 pm
by timoo
OMG LOLOLOL!

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:40 pm
by Limely
Lol. You are the most sad person ever. :roll:
Where did my location-thingie go anyways? Or my post count? You forgot to add in that, did you?

And by the way, I never use words like failure, or the expression regards. Because my sig is enough of a regards, that's why. My writing style is also over all quite different. Study your subject before you create oh-so-obviously fake "proof".
I'm going to get some sleep now, and you'll obviously go around and throw about more shit about me while I can't defend myself because you don't have anything better to do. You, and I quote, "are a failure".

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:45 pm
by timoo
Limely wrote:Where did my location-thingie go anyways? Or my post count? You forgot to add in that, did you?
OWN3D.
Nice one Limely, I've never laughed so much.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:04 pm
by RZ_AntitoonNato
At least we've tried... and FAILED :lol:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:49 pm
by timoo
Never thought it'd work again though.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:51 pm
by neo
Yes these imposters have failed, they are not mods. :wink:

Don't worry limely they are just messing with you just ignore them.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:57 pm
by Hunchman801
Those imposters are actually members of ARZO/KRZK, so don't pay attention to them. Now they've failed, I guess they'll wait for one year or two before they pop out again and try to fool someone else.
I'm afraid I'll never understand how some people can waste their time this way.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:01 am
by Reese Riverson
... well, I am going to give my opinion. Luckster is a good mod who wouldn't do things like that. Most of us here would know she is not at fault.

*Agrees with Hunchman*

Re: Ranks

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:15 am
by Hunchman801
We all support Luckster and accusing her because she was hacked is just unfair. The KRZK is really appalling :|