Page 475 of 1084

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:50 pm
by Hunchman801
Higher quality? What do you exactly mean?

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:52 pm
by Beebop
Gold is worth more than silver.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:52 pm
by Holy Crap
i don't know. easier to work with maybe? i think it's more malleable and ductile, and a better conductor.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:53 pm
by Hunchman801
Beebop wrote:Gold is worth more than silver.
What does it have to do with quality? :|
Holy Crap wrote:i don't know. easier to work with maybe? i think it's more malleable and ductile, and a better conductor.
That's all right ;)

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:57 pm
by Holy Crap
being worth more doesn't mean it's higher quality.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:57 pm
by Beebop
Hunchman801 wrote:What does it have to do with quality? :|
It usually tends to be worth more, no matter what carat it is, and plus the fact that gold is rarer than silver.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:59 pm
by Holy Crap
but rarity does not equal quality. neither does price. take my advice: stick with the options i gave you, it will make your case look good.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 12:27 am
by timoo
Beebop seems to confuse it all.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:25 am
by Jman
Beebop wrote:
Hunchman801 wrote:What does it have to do with quality? :|
It usually tends to be worth more, no matter what carat it is, and plus the fact that gold is rarer than silver.
I actually would prefer Platinum.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:38 am
by Holy Crap
yes!!! hooray for platinum!

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:56 pm
by Luckster
If we're talking about preferences of precious metals, I prefer white gold when it comes to real jewelry.

I honestly prefer fake jewelry myself. It's just as beautiful without breaking the budget.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:35 pm
by El Dango
Back on topic:
If/when i get Ninjaws, i won't move on. Ninjaws is awesome. If only it was possible to choose between different armies, groups and stuff.
Hoodlums (grim, hoodstormer, hoodblaster, grimkeeper, spinneroo, hoodoo, hoodmonger officer, heckler, lavomatrix, Toots and Andre)
robo-pirates (Green pirate, blue pirate, yellow pirate, cabin boy, red pirate, keg pirate, Ninjaws, Biditank and Razorbeard)
the people (Baby glute, Uglette, Taraysan, Musican, Joe, Begoniax, Sssssam, Carmen, Mr Dark, Razzof, Clark, Globox and Rayman)
the magical beings (Electoon, antitoon, red lum, yellow lum, blue lum, green lum, silver lum, forest teensie, ghost teensie, Tily, king teensie, Murfy, random knaaren, Gumsi, Reflux and Ly)
and the spirits (Familiar spirit, Axel, Umber, Foutch, Grolem/Grolgem/Grolgem13, Guardian of the COBD, Leptys and Polukus)

I know i missed some, but seriously, there are SO many characters. Besides these, there are: The explorers, Mudibog, the tribelles, the matavus, the jumping eyes, the spiders, the zombie chickens, Dark Rayman, the three doctors and a lot more.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:41 am
by Holy Crap
i don't really think this has been on topic for about 470 pages. after the original purpose was fulfilled, it really just became like a general chat thread.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:57 am
by Hunchman801
It has, but nothing prevents us from talking about ranks though. To answer R4_121, it's just impossible to create a logical ranklist with such groups: don't forget that the order of ranks has been deeply thought in the past. Moreover, it would be quite hard to sort all characters into those groups :|

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:24 am
by Holy Crap
whoa! my post reply button cam back!!! hooray!!!
but yeah, sorting all the characters into groups would take to long and be kinda pointless.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:27 am
by Jman
Yeah, and now you can go and comment about them.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:31 am
by Holy Crap
alright, i'll have to find the thread though.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:32 am
by Jman
It won't be that hard. :roll:

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:33 am
by Holy Crap
i wasn't sure if it would be very close to the top or not, and i'm bad at finding threads.

Re: Ranks

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:58 am
by Hunchman801
What thread are you talking about? :|