Page 49 of 63

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:36 pm
by Rayrobi
Serza5 wrote:Can you tell me what you think so far :
Image
?
It looks really cool indeed! :P

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:38 pm
by Rulez
RayR - he's bi!

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 3:58 pm
by Serza5
Ok so as well as the one above I just updated I have : [1] and [2]

So um yeah??

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:03 pm
by Rayrobi
The first one is so awesome! Thank you! Do you still want to work on it or is it fully completed so i can use it?

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:07 pm
by Serza5
There's not much more I could add to it unless there's something else you think I should add.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:21 pm
by Rayrobi
Thanks once more. Have this 500 tings. (:

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:27 pm
by Serza5
Nice. :D

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 5:57 pm
by Shrooblord
I really like the glowing effect that seems to originate from inside the middle of the letters. How did you achieve that? Gradient in a circle with bright colours with the letters as the boundrary for the colouring?

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:53 pm
by Serza5
Not quite. I had 2 layers of text, I set the boundary to the letters and then did a Gaussian blur (set to 30.0 px in both x and y) on it, while slightly adjusting the opacity of that layer. Only other thing worth noting is that I also had another text layer underneath them both that has also been blurred only the boundary is the image size.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:59 pm
by Rulez
^ that's like one of the most basic GIMP things lol.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:03 pm
by Rayrobi
Rulez wrote:^ that's like one of the most basic GIMP things lol.
You just know, huh? :P

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:04 pm
by Rulez
Well yeah, GIMP's my bitch.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:43 pm
by neo
Photoshop forever alone

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:44 pm
by Rulez
neo wrote:Photoshop forever alone
That's a good thing though, PS is better

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 11:09 pm
by Shrooblord
Yeah that's what I meant, now I read the correct terminology... ;)

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 12:32 pm
by Rulez
Looking back, Rayrobi has no taste.
Serza5 wrote: [1] and [2]
These are shitty, the very very first one was brilliant. Yet Rayrobi uses... ekh...

...

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 4:15 pm
by Serza5
It's what he wants. And he could always use the others ones if he decides that one is shit as you said.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 5:00 pm
by GNineify
I do not find your criticism very constructive, Rulez.

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 6:24 pm
by Rulez
Well yeah, seeing as I didn't use any. Do you want me to?

Re: Signature/Banner Topic

Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:08 pm
by Adsolution
GNineify wrote:I do not find your criticism very constructive, Rulez.
Image