Page 6 of 14

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:48 pm
by Hunchman801
I play it on PC, but it is the same ;) I also own the PS2 version (Rayman Revolution).

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:54 pm
by Avis0
There is also a Rayman 2 The Great Escape for playstation or only Rayman 2 Revolution?

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:20 pm
by Hunchman801
The PS and the PS2 versions are really different ;)

Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 12:10 am
by Avis0
Which is the great escape and which the revolution?

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:09 am
by Hunchman801
The PS1 version is called The Great Escape whereas the PS2 version was renamed Revolution - which is stupid, for both are very different from the PC-N4 version.

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:42 am
by Avis0
Now I get it, but why revolution, it's crazy!

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:03 am
by supmachin
I do not know, maybe to be attractive! :P

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 7:26 pm
by Avis0
Well, you're right, it is attractive, remember that Wii was once called Revolution :wink:

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:11 pm
by supmachin
Revolution is a bad name for a console... A very bad name! :P

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:49 pm
by Avis0
I don't think so, it had a special meaning for the console, the revolution to recover 1st place in the competition

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:24 pm
by supmachin
The Wii will not be the 1st console. And the revolution is the video-game, not the console to play this video-game.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 3:23 am
by Hunchman801
They should have called it Rayman 2: Revolution, at least :roll:

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 5:11 am
by Avis0
supmachin wrote:The Wii will not be the 1st console. And the revolution is the video-game, not the console to play this video-game.
Nope, the revolution was the name for the console and I think that Wii will recover 1st place with its unique gameplay and fresh games, not as PS3 AND XBOX360 that are focusing only in graphics and violence games

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 9:13 am
by supmachin
I know Revolution was the name, but a console can't be a revolution.
And I prefer good games, funny and innovatives with a great gameplay and immersives graphics to a good game with a great gameplay and not funny.

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:44 pm
by Avis0
Yep, fun and gameplay is a good combination, graphics are also important, but it's only a secondary detail

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:52 pm
by supmachin
All details form the game.

Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:02 am
by Hunchman801
I really loved the graphic style of Rayman 2.

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:30 pm
by Avis0
Yes, all details are important, but primary details are more important than secondary ones

Posted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:00 pm
by Hunchman801
For instance, the sky, or the ancient ruins. Everything rocked.

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 5:27 pm
by Razo-raz
I prefer Rayman 3, 'cause i only played Rayman 2 on my friends Dreamcast, he wont let me play it much, but i have completed Rayman 3 for about 5 times, so - Rayman Hoodlum Havoc