Master wrote:Hm, yeah, the red of Gallifrey doesn't really work well with the blues of the other locations. Lemme see to that:
10/10
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 7:07 am
by Bradandez
5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:28 pm
by technology4617
Bradandez wrote:5/10 for me. I don't find the text appealing.
It's better than the one I had before, though, and, to be honest, it's just the watermark for some of my YouTube videos.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 9:34 pm
by Serza5
5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:16 pm
by Adsolution
I kind of like the italics then non-italics, but other than that, I agree with what Serza has to say. Mind you, I think it can work, but it actually needs more effects.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:44 am
by technology4617
Serza5 wrote:5/10. Eh it's stylish but my main issues with it are :
- Why is the "gaming" text not italic? It doesn't look bad but it does seem kind of silly to do part rather than all or nothing
- Plain black backgrounds are just ugh, I guess some colours don't suit RPCs background but i'm sure you can get away with making yours transparent
- Plain and simple is nice but yours feel that bit too plain
In other words: It's not bad but it doesn't look all that nice either.
The "gaming" text is not italicized to make it easier to distinguish the two separate words. I agree that my new signature is not the best thing in the world, but it's more just a temporary-ish solution to provide something better than what I currently had.
To tell the truth, my signature is actually just the watermark I sometimes use for YouTube videos:
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 3:56 am
by Serza5
I attempted a new sig that's randomized to each of my Pokeman boyfrands. Rates pls? It's still sorta WIP.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:26 am
by Serza5
May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:27 am
by Adsolution
Ooh! That's a 9.5/10 from me. I really like the placement and everything, and I think the colour scheme blends in great with RPC. You should have three randomised signatures, each one having a different character selected and displayed on the right.
EDIT:
Sorry, I accidentally deleted my post instead of editing it. This is supposed to be between Serza's two posts.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:28 am
by Serza5
Hehe Ads messed up.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:30 am
by Adsolution
Serza5 wrote:May I ask which one you are referring to? I have 3 in the randomizer but it seems to favour Colress from my part.
Oh, you do have them randomised, heheh. It's only displaying Colress then for me as well.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:32 am
by Serza5
The other two has popped up for me but yeah heavily favours Colress by the sight of it. Colress is my favourite one though as I have issues with the other two.
Sycamore being that i'm not fond of his colours which I could fix. Wallace on the other hand has a much lower quality image than the other two and I have no idea where the original source of his image is.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:36 am
by Adsolution
Ah, Sycamore just showed up now.
At a glance, I think the blue is almost too saturated in front of the RPC theme, but then only after a second I stopped noticing the clash. I quite like it this way, that's a great blue and I think it should stay as such.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:39 am
by Serza5
That's exactly my thinking but hm. I guess I could link all of them individually since I do have them on my dropbox: Colress Sycamore Wallace
Right now it's liking Wallace for me.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:42 am
by Adsolution
Wallace (first time seeing his sig) has the best chemistry with the RPC theme, but against the white background, I like them all equally. I wouldn't worry about it.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:44 am
by Serza5
Heh thanks a bunch. I still feel like I want to do a bit more to it though.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 4:47 am
by Hoodcom
9.5/10. Great work, Serza.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:16 pm
by Master
Looking good indeed, like how there's a change in the background colour to reflect their different shades of blue.
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:11 pm
by Serza5
Thanks much!
Re: Rate that signature!
Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 8:46 pm
by Rulez
That's a lovely sig! I like it a lot. At first, when it turns to the middle guy (I'm sorry) I thought it's a bit too light, like Ad did, but that was just because I was too used to the other, not Wallace guy. 11/10