Rayman Pirate-Community

It's quite spooky really. Our planet might just be in a museum observed by greater beings... xDD

You know when you're in a rush and then a slow person is in front of you, or there's a big queue, or there are red traffic lights on constantly? It's almost like someone's saying "lol this person's in a rush let's do this etc."

The universe is a computerized simulation? Whaaat? I guess it's something extremely distantly possible, but it's one of the craziest beliefs I've heard.

When you think about it, it's exactly as likely as the belief that the universe was created by some sort of god.

I cant believe how this whole thing started.

Wrong. Science has in fact proven evoultion.

Science was never even close to prove how the universe was made. No particle accelerator will ever do that. Why not ? Simply because thats 15 000 000 000 years ago. All evidence is already gone. And what we may think is evidence most likely comes from an other source. Or maybe we just can understand how it began. We already said that nothing can not turn into the universe. And what theory you come with, it's always going this argument that will prove it wrong. What was before ? We humans just can't understand "what was before that" and we'll most likely never will.

Agreed. But evolving to adapt to a certain area in the world is true.

Joshua822 wrote:

Wrong. Science has in fact proven evoultion.

Science was never even close to prove how the universe was made. No particle accelerator will ever do that. Why not ? Simply because thats 15 000 000 000 years ago. All evidence is already gone. And what we may think is evidence most likely comes from an other source. Or maybe we just can understand how it began. We already said that nothing can not turn into the universe. And what theory you come with, it's always going this argument that will prove it wrong. What was before ? We humans just can't understand "what was before that" and we'll most likely never will.

That's a really nice speech, but you have apparently missed one very important point: The theory of evolution is not a theory about how the universe began. It's a proven theory from the field of biology. Read more about it here

Hunchman801 wrote:However, evolution is a likely scientific theory, whereas creationism is not only a medieval absurdity and an obscurantist view, but also a religious belief, and as I said earlier, there is no place for religion at school.

You don't know much about religion-based schools, and their, well, effects that would surprise you. And when talking on absurdity - lots of tribes in America and India call some of theories used by you as an absurdity - and, surprisingly, their arguments are kinda better than yours.

On point of Tobbe's post: Microevolution is proved theory, but making hot swaps between it and macroevolution is move like, let's say, "If you don't believe this PC is working, you mean all the transistors in it aren't either".

stan423321 wrote: On point of Tobbe's post: Microevolution is proved theory, but making hot swaps between it and macroevolution is move like, let's say, "If you don't believe this PC is working, you mean all the transistors in it aren't either".

How on earth is that the same?

@Hunch: Which is more human, a nine-month-old foetus, or a human skin cell? One considerable difference between the two is that one is a conscious, if underdeveloped, human being which will eventually mature into an adult, while the other is an inanimate piece of human matter which will never, ever amount to anything. Whatever you say, I will NEVER agree with anyone that says that shedding a skin cell is akin to having a miscarriage.

@Stacey: I don't think Baby P should have been aborted because its mother was an asshole. I think that the baby should have been taken from her and given to a loving family.

@Tobbe: Bin Laden's existence wouldn't be a problem if it weren't for RELIGION, that affliction of all humanity.

I wasn't referring to aborting Baby P, I was referring to every single slob cunt that is pregnant right now and does not deserve to have children at all.

I was saying that these vermin should have their children taken from them and given to someone who wants children, but who can or will not have their own, for whatever reason.

I'm all for human spading xDDDDDD

stan423321 wrote:You don't know much about religion-based schools, and their, well, effects that would surprise you. And when talking on absurdity - lots of tribes in America and India call some of theories used by you as an absurdity - and, surprisingly, their arguments are kinda better than yours.

I agree.

Plus, Private Schools aren't as harsh, and usually don't contain you're average drug induced bitch teenagers. Also, bullies, creepy gay guys, and jerks in general are very rare. Making friends is so easy, unlike Public Schools, where you can only manage to have a person befriend you until a few hours later and their hatred for you resets. I'm not sure if it's like that in all Public schools, but the one I went to for a year were full of mean-spirited people that gave me dirty looks for simply clearing my throat. Also, everyone in the class were complete morons. Having intelligent conversations was damn near impossible. But maybe it was because the public school I was at was worse than the average one.

But it depends. Catholic schools that have nuns, aren't very pleasant. But Christian schools (where I went to) are so easy and full of people that treat you like a person and don't threat you with a knife while on stuff that's illegal. I could clear my throat when I want to. I could have a crush on a girl that wasn't a lesbo or incest (trust me, at Copenhagen, every girl was either those two), and fun, intelligent conversations are achieved by merely talking to some one for a wee second. But again, maybe the Private school (Faith Fellowship) was nicer than the usual private school. Well, nonetheless, the school kicked ass. God bless it.

stan423321 wrote:You don't know much about religion-based schools, and their, well, effects that would surprise you. And when talking on absurdity - lots of tribes in America and India call some of theories used by you as an absurdity - and, surprisingly, their arguments are kinda better than yours.

All I know about religion interfering with education is that it's a terrible obstacle for intelligence and knowledge, as proved in the past. Then again, I'd like to know which arguments you're talking about, because your post doesn't make any point

spiraldoor wrote:Which is more human, a nine-month-old foetus, or a human skin cell? One considerable difference between the two is that one is a conscious, if underdeveloped, human being which will eventually mature into an adult, while the other is an inanimate piece of human matter which will never, ever amount to anything. Whatever you say, I will NEVER agree with anyone that says that shedding a skin cell is akin to having a miscarriage.

Since when are foetuses conscious? They're not even humans

Hunchman801 wrote:

stan423321 wrote:You don't know much about religion-based schools, and their, well, effects that would surprise you. And when talking on absurdity - lots of tribes in America and India call some of theories used by you as an absurdity - and, surprisingly, their arguments are kinda better than yours.

All I know about religion interfering with education is that it's a terrible obstacle for intelligence and knowledge, as proved in the past. Then again, I'd like to know which arguments you're talking about, because your post doesn't make any point

spiraldoor wrote:Which is more human, a nine-month-old foetus, or a human skin cell? One considerable difference between the two is that one is a conscious, if underdeveloped, human being which will eventually mature into an adult, while the other is an inanimate piece of human matter which will never, ever amount to anything. Whatever you say, I will NEVER agree with anyone that says that shedding a skin cell is akin to having a miscarriage.

Since when are foetuses conscious? They're not even humans

How many more times are we going to use that emoticon?

Hunchman801 wrote:Since when are foetuses conscious? They're not even humans

Indeed, they don't develop the brain for a while. And I would also like to see what arguements Stan is talking about.

That's a really nice speech, but you have apparently missed one very important point: The theory of evolution is not a theory about how the universe began. It's a proven theory from the field of biology. Read more about it here

Excues me Well, i wasn't awere of this yet.

But, i think this is a good question : Why can't evolution exist when God created the earth ? Even the order in the bible matches with the order of evolution. And he could have created the first forms of live. Which he letted evaluate to become who we humans are today.

@Hunchman801 : Religion does have something to do with knowledge. We can learn much about how whe humans should treath our world and life. And that's the most important knowledge that exists.
@Shawn : I don't agree. Not every public school is full of morrons and not every christian school has the nicest people.
@Hunchman801 ( again ) : A foetus is human. The only thing is that it doesn't have human skills yet. If a foetus isn't human we aren't to. Because we all where foetuses in the past.

Hunchman801 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:Which is more human, a nine-month-old foetus, or a human skin cell? One considerable difference between the two is that one is a conscious, if underdeveloped, human being which will eventually mature into an adult, while the other is an inanimate piece of human matter which will never, ever amount to anything. Whatever you say, I will NEVER agree with anyone that says that shedding a skin cell is akin to having a miscarriage.

Since when are foetuses conscious? They're not even humans

Foetuses are conscious. Sometimes they sleep in the womb, sometimes they wake up. When awake, they can hear the sounds nearby, and so are conscious of their surroundings, though obviously not yet as self-aware as an adult.

Shawn wrote:I could have a crush on a girl that wasn't a lesbo or incest (trust me, at Copenhagen, every girl was either those two)

How can a girl be an incest? :/

TL;DR you're pro-life, right? Well I gotta hand it to you, I watched this programme the other week about animals in the womb and it was some of the most amazing things I've ever seen.

As for incest, well it happens among both genders and all ages. Even some of the Royal family at least had sex with their cousins.