Rayman Pirate-Community

Not really needed, it's full of questions about irrelevant things and aside from mentioning a preview of this game there's nothing special going on.

Wow, huh! Alright then; it's amusing you found that in your subscription! Though, would it be possible yo give a very brief translation of the five questions and answers? Just the gist of them, you don't have to translate every word. I only ask because it obviously pertains to us and I need to be very careful and analytical over whatever media attention the project gets.

Questions 1-5 have nothing to do with ROTD.
Question 6, translated as faithfully as possible, presented to you by Drolpiraat: "6. and the last question I have on the internet some guy is making rayman revene of the dark can you make a prievew of it the game's not done yet but can you already look fo it"
Answer 6: "6. Good idea! The following is now in Jan's agenda: 'prievew revene of the dark of guy fo look'. Will be fine!"
This is the text under the screenshot: "This is a screenshot of rayman revene of dark in advance."

Seems to me like the possible reviewer is being more sarcastic than anything else...

Are these spelling mistakes on purpose because there were spelling mistakes in Dutch text too?

OldClassicGamer wrote:Are these spelling mistakes on purpose because there were spelling mistakes in Dutch text too?

Yup, it was full of spelling mistakes, and the spelling mistakes by the game journalist were definitely on purpose. It doesn't look like the journalist is going to preview it, it rather looks like a very sarcastic answer to all the spelling mistakes...

The game is still in the VERY early stages of development, and assholes like these need to see that.

I would like to see them try to make a better game.

OldClassicGamer wrote:I would like to see them try to make a better game.

Meh, I don't like that argument either, though. It's the job of a game reviewer to review games, not make them. However, that doesn't change the fact that they are obviously ignorant of game design, and that a finished, completed project can't be made that quickly by such a small development team.

I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

Adsolution wrote:I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

I completely agree, at least, that's how I saw it

Adsolution wrote:I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

But the reviewer also seemed to me to be skeptical about whether it would be a good game or "just another fan game."

Well, he can think what he wants, as I haven't given the 'public' overwhelming reason to believe it won't be discontinued, despite my implications and our team's full intention on finishing it.

technology4617 wrote:

Adsolution wrote:I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

But the reviewer also seemed to me to be skeptical about whether it would be a good game or "just another fan game."

Nah, I don't think that's his intention. I rather agree with Ad & Imco, it's just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

Drolpiraat wrote:

technology4617 wrote:

Adsolution wrote:I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

But the reviewer also seemed to me to be skeptical about whether it would be a good game or "just another fan game."

Nah, I don't think that's his intention. I rather agree with Ad & Imco, it's just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

I gotta say, I also think it's just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

Rulez wrote:

Drolpiraat wrote:

technology4617 wrote:

Adsolution wrote:I don't see what's so assholeish or ignorant about that. It didn't sound like a mock of the project at all, just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

But the reviewer also seemed to me to be skeptical about whether it would be a good game or "just another fan game."

Nah, I don't think that's his intention. I rather agree with Ad & Imco, it's just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

I gotta say, I also think it's just a funny, sarcastic response to a dumb questionnaire.

Logged in today to post about this! (I also have a subscription) The guys making the magazine usually make fun of poorly written letters.

Wut...

Hehe, RoTD was first brought to light on RPC by a member called Sabertooth, he's the original creator of this very thread. Ad however, was made owner of the first post later on so he could edit it and add details on his project.

Master said it all!

Master wrote:Hehe, RoTD was first brought to light on RPC by a member called Sabertooth, he's the original creator of this very thread. Ad however, was made owner of the first post later on so he could edit it and add details on his project.

Master, come on, there's no use in lying Adsolution is a time traveller, you see.

Rulez wrote:

Master wrote:Hehe, RoTD was first brought to light on RPC by a member called Sabertooth, he's the original creator of this very thread. Ad however, was made owner of the first post later on so he could edit it and add details on his project.

Master, come on, there's no use in lying Adsolution is a time traveller, you see.

But, technically, wouldn't his account be nonexistent at that time?