Rayman Pirate-Community

Buddy, this entire topic itself is the very epitome of "laugh stock".

What I meant is how I made a laugh stock of myself, because all I did was take up a topic tht turned out to be controversial to mister big admin and still it hadn't been unlocked even though tere was new answer added and I can't even answer it there. I really do believe the admins are not dumb, but illogical.

You actually did kind of made laughing stock of yourself by overreacting about people's signatures in the first post of your locked topic. Sure they're big, but they're not annoyingly huge, and on top of that, your example in your first post was over exaggerated. Anyway, what you were implying was that the sigs were annoying to everybody, and that's obviously not the case. Especially after you began to insult people for disagreeing with you, they now seek to make fun of you because that's what many of the members (admins included) here in RPC do when somebody begins to act like a dumb idiot. I would suggest you deal with it, let it slide and don't do it again. But that's up to you, really.

I can't agree with any of that, but if this is the logic of all here then we have nothing to talk about! I didn't go on sb because he contradicted me or disagreed, I went on ppl for calling me names. Also I never said that everyone thinks its a problem, I said that IT IS A PROBLEM, just noone questions it because everyone is doing it(So they want to be popular...).
Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.

If it makes anyone happier, I didn't choose the sigs but just took all of those that were at the moment on front pages of the forum. Sure some of these are clearly ok in terms of their look but are too big! However I was no allowed to get into conversation because the thread was locked by particular person...

Then I think I have nothing more to discuss with you. Hope you'll be able to get used to big signatures soon because nuthin' here is gonna change for the sake of one guy's pet peeve.

Pusianka wrote:I didn't go on sb because he contradicted me or disagreed, I went on ppl for calling me names.

...Which you can expect for calling the pictures that people spent lots of time and love into to make them as good looking as possible a pile of "FLYING CRAP".

Pusianka wrote:Also I never said that everyone thinks its a problem, I said that IT IS A PROBLEM,

But the thing is you're acting like it's some great big problem, when in fact it isn't anything at all. In fact, RayFan even told you how to stop the signatures from showing themselves to you back a few pages so that you didn't need to worry about.

Pusianka wrote:just noone questions it because everyone is doing it(So they want to be popular...).

No, as a matter of fact people make a signature because it pretties up the place. It also allows a way of identifying that user because people can see that picture and instantly know it's that user posting.

Pusianka wrote:Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.

...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.

Pusianka wrote:HELL IT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ WITHOU......T THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP EVERY SECON......D POST! SERIOUSLY! Some of these doesnt even apply for a signature! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT A SIGNATURE IS?!?!?!

'Nuff said.

Pusianka wrote:However I was no allowed to get into conversation because the thread was locked by particular person...

As I said above, when you insult something which many people worked hard on to allow them to be identified instantly by the rest of the forum (Or post about an "important issue" which isn't really an issue nor is it important for that matter), you're bound to get your topic locked. Especially when you start it off with the bitch fit you had.

Funny, another manipulation above! Keep it coming! I should write a book...

Pusianka wrote:Funny, another manipulation above! Keep it coming! I should write a book...

So much facepalmery to describe this. So much. Please explain how my post above is a "manipulation"?

The Edditaur wrote:

Pusianka wrote:Funny, another manipulation above! Keep it coming! I should write a book...

So much facepalmery to describe this. So much. Please explain how my post above is a "manipulation"?

Yes, please do explain, Pusianka. I asked you if you wanted to take my hand and laugh this off, but what do I get in return? Such an ungrateful one.

Too much quoteing and I have exams till 17th May. I take a break from that for this time. Basically he didnt show the contrast in what I said, and "Nuff said" didnt prove a darn thing.

Pusianka wrote:Basically he didnt show the contrast in what I said, and "Nuff said" didnt prove a darn thing.

Right, let me correct you there.

The Edditaur wrote:...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.

Pusianka on the 'YOUR SIGS ARE TOO BIG!' Topic wrote:HELL IT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ WITHOU......T THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP EVERY SECON......D POST! SERIOUSLY! Some of these doesnt even apply for a signature! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT A SIGNATURE IS?!?!?!

'Nuff said.

I even highlighted it in red for you. Not many people get that kind of privilege. You basically said in your earlier post that you "hadn't insulted anyone". That above quote, the one highlighted in red, is the one which proves otherwise. Do you understand now? Would you also care to point out where I went wrong in every other part of my dissection of your post? Because you only stated there why one part of it was wrong in your post.

I read every single word in this topic, and I have to say, hats off to you guys for being my evening entertainment.

The Edditaur wrote:

Pusianka wrote:Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.

...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.

Pusianka wrote:HELL IT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ WITHOU......T THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP EVERY SECON......D POST! SERIOUSLY! Some of these doesnt even apply for a signature! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT A SIGNATURE IS?!?!?!

'Nuff said.

Feel promoted that I decided to take my time for this one. Still "nuff said" isn't proving a darn thing.

*Nuff isn't even a word, which also concerns me : P

'Nuff said means Enough said.

Pusianka wrote:

The Edditaur wrote:

Pusianka wrote:Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.

...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.

Pusianka wrote:HELL IT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ WITHOU......T THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP EVERY SECON......D POST! SERIOUSLY! Some of these doesnt even apply for a signature! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT A SIGNATURE IS?!?!?!

'Nuff said.

Feel promoted that I decided to take my time for this one. Still "nuff said" isn't proving a darn thing.

*Nuff isn't even a word, which also concerns me : P

Pussi, now you're merely coming up with lame excuses to cover your sorry immature ass. You know exactly where you went wrong, so you can either admit yourself or continue to make yourself look like an even larger, fatter fool. You're not clever, you're not witty, you can't for the life of you come up with a decent come back, so sit down and stare at your feet or something.

Pusianka wrote:

The Edditaur wrote:

Pusianka wrote:I didn't insulted anyone

Pusianka wrote:THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP

Feel promoted that I decided to take my time for this one. Still "nuff said" isn't proving a darn thing.

*Nuff isn't even a word, which also concerns me : P

Right, I showed you the actual full two bits which directly contradicting each other. You can't possibly misinterpret it this time. Those two bits in red over there are the ones which are proving a darn thing. Oh, and also when you called all of our signatures "flying crap". That strengthens my point as well.
'Nuff is internet lingo, FYI. So no need to be concerned for me, I'm just trying to "be hip" and "with the kids".

RayFan9876 wrote:

Pusianka wrote:

The Edditaur wrote:

Pusianka wrote:Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.

...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.

Pusianka wrote:HELL IT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ WITHOU......T THIS WHOLE SHIT SHOWING UP EVERY SECON......D POST! SERIOUSLY! Some of these doesnt even apply for a signature! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT A SIGNATURE IS?!?!?!

'Nuff said.

Feel promoted that I decided to take my time for this one. Still "nuff said" isn't proving a darn thing.

*Nuff isn't even a word, which also concerns me : P

Pussi, now you're merely coming up with lame excuses to cover your sorry immature ass. You know exactly where you went wrong, so you can either admit yourself or continue to make yourself look like an even larger, fatter fool. You're not clever, you're not witty, you can't for the life of you come up with a decent come back, so sit down and stare at your feet or something.

Or! I was actually prepared for a conversation in MY thread and just wasn't allowed for one! But of course this is fully hypothetical...

Pusianka wrote:Or! I was actually prepared for a conversation in MY thread and just wasn't allowed for one! But of course this is fully hypothetical...

...Must I post this again?
*Sigh*, okay then.

Pusianka wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:Pussi, now you're merely coming up with lame excuses to cover your sorry immature ass. You know exactly where you went wrong, so you can either admit yourself or continue to make yourself look like an even larger, fatter fool. You're not clever, you're not witty, you can't for the life of you come up with a decent come back, so sit down and stare at your feet or something.

Or! I was actually prepared for a conversation in MY thread and just wasn't allowed for one! But of course this is fully hypothetical...

The fuck does that have to do with anything?

RayFan9876 wrote:

Pusianka wrote:

RayFan9876 wrote:Pussi, now you're merely coming up with lame excuses to cover your sorry immature ass. You know exactly where you went wrong, so you can either admit yourself or continue to make yourself look like an even larger, fatter fool. You're not clever, you're not witty, you can't for the life of you come up with a decent come back, so sit down and stare at your feet or something.

Or! I was actually prepared for a conversation in MY thread and just wasn't allowed for one! But of course this is fully hypothetical...

The fuck does that have to do with anything?

Use brain, I alread know you have it, so USE IT.