Rayman Pirate-Community

Adsolution wrote:I didn't realise how low-quality the production was until I just saw that clip again. Even for an independent film, I'm sure they could have rendered out something higher quality than that.

Nonetheless though, a good movie.

I'm all with ya there. It's been ages since I've seen it, so when I found this, I was like, "Oh my. They've done some improvement with graphics, haven't they?"

And yes. A good movie indeed. That's one I'm not throwing off my shelf.

I absolutely loved this movie!

Minor-T5 wrote:I absolutely loved this movie!

Same here man. Most people who see this movie end up loving this movie. XD

You are very right!
The second one just didn't seem as good as the first one. It was okay, out of 5 stars, I would give it a 3.

Minor-T5 wrote:You are very right!
The second one just didn't seem as good as the first one. It was okay, out of 5 stars, I would give it a 3.

I fully agree with you there. Original rules. Second one could have done better.

And I hate the characters redesigns .

Minor-T5 wrote:And I hate the characters redesigns .

Same here. Yeesh. You can obviously tell on that movie they tried WAY too hard. X(

Sometimes sequels are only good once or twice, take Spider-Man 3 for example, that movie was BAD, and the others were great.

I liked Spider-Man 3 actually. There were a lot of silly parts, but I thought that some of the greatest moments in the trilogy were from it.

I didn't even have that much of a problem with emo-Toby.

It was only okay. It was only good to the Sandman fight, then the movie just got stupid. The Amazing Spider-Man was so much better than the older ones.

That point I do agree on. It was one of my favourite movies of the year.

Hoodwinked is quite a bit slightly worse than I remember.

One of my favorite characters from the move was the Lumberjack. The movie wouldn't be the same without him.

Minor-T5 wrote:One of my favorite characters from the move was the Lumberjack. The movie wouldn't be the same without him.

Obviously. If you were to remove any character from any movie ever, the movie would in no way be the same. Technically.

Rulez wrote:Obviously. If you were to remove any character from any movie ever, the movie would in no way be the same. Technically.

I know, but if they took Lumberjack guy out, the movie wouldn't be good at all.

If a single character makes a movie good for you, you must b

Did you finish that sentence?

In a way, yes. It's not exactly worth finishing, considering your opinion on what makes a movie good.

You're not getting what I'm trying to say.
Lets just drop this conversation, okay?

You're not getting what I'm trying to say.