Page 8 of 11
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:05 pm
by Jona
I know, and that's not the reason why I tell that to him. Nobody's waiting for people to bring back topics.
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 11:35 am
by Newray
1: R3
2: R2
3: R1
4: RM
5: The other Rayman games
6: Beyond Good & Evil
7: Prince of Persia Warrior Within
8: Prince of Persia the Sands of Time
9: Ghost Recon Jungle Storm
10: Ghost Recon 2
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:18 pm
by Matyuv
supmachin wrote:I think all Prince of Persia are bad, because, not beautiful, and bad for all points !
huh? huh?
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:41 pm
by th3()ne
supmachin... you die now
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:34 am
by Matyuv
We, in Tonga, eat people, you know.
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 9:12 pm
by th3()ne
*laughs for real* XDddDDxxxdddxDDDddd
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:10 pm
by Xenon
HavocRay wrote:1: R3
2: R2
3: R1
4: RM
5: The other Rayman games
6: Beyond Good & Evil
7: Prince of Persia Warrior Within
8: Prince of Persia the Sands of Time
9: Ghost Recon Jungle Storm
10: Ghost Recon 2
Doesn't Rayman 3 frustrate you?
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 9:49 am
by Matyuv
in diferent accounts Ruy has different opinions.
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:25 am
by Xenon
ROFL.
At least he's stopped making accounts now.
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:36 am
by Jona
He did make another new one on RZ. wtf...
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:45 am
by Xenon
For crying out loud....
What is the point? Having 2, or maybe even three is satisfactory, but having.....6 is just...
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:25 pm
by Newray
Xenon09 wrote:HavocRay wrote:1: R3
2: R2
3: R1
4: RM
5: The other Rayman games
6: Beyond Good & Evil
7: Prince of Persia Warrior Within
8: Prince of Persia the Sands of Time
9: Ghost Recon Jungle Storm
10: Ghost Recon 2
Doesn't Rayman 3 frustrate you?
No, I just like the R3 graphics and stuff, and i am not really mastering my R3 score..
And about the accounts, i allready quitted that.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:36 pm
by Xenon
I got bored of Rayman 3 as soon as I knew that I couldn't improve my score. So there was nothing left to do.
However, Rayman 2 has a replayability style. Collecting all the Lums is more enjoyable than spending hours of time trying to improve the score, for me.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:58 pm
by Jona
But that doesn't make it not replayable. R2 is less replayable than R3, that's definitely the truth. Getting all the lums and cages is not extremely difficult, while getting over 830000 points in R3 is difficult. Which means it takes longer to get, thus you need to play the game more to achieve it, and that means it has a higher replayability value.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:31 pm
by Matyuv
Ruy wrote:Xenon09 wrote:HavocRay wrote:1: R3
2: R2
3: R1
4: RM
5: The other Rayman games
6: Beyond Good & Evil
7: Prince of Persia Warrior Within
8: Prince of Persia the Sands of Time
9: Ghost Recon Jungle Storm
10: Ghost Recon 2
Doesn't Rayman 3 frustrate you?
No, I just like the R3 graphics and stuff, and i am not really mastering my R3 score..
And about the accounts, i allready quitted that.
yay for you.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 5:36 pm
by Xenon
Jona wrote:But that doesn't make it not replayable. R2 is less replayable than R3, that's definitely the truth. Getting all the lums and cages is not extremely difficult, while getting over 830000 points in R3 is difficult. Which means it takes longer to get, thus you need to play the game more to achieve it, and that means it has a higher replayability value.
Rayman 3 has good replayability the first 5 odd times you play it. After a while I'm sure most of us wouldn't be bothered to improve our scores.
But anyway, if I asked you which Rayman game you would like to play you would more likely say Rayman 2. Am I right.
Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2005 8:24 pm
by Matyuv
Jona wrote:But that doesn't make it not replayable. R2 is less replayable than R3, that's definitely the truth. Getting all the lums and cages is not extremely difficult, while getting over 830000 points in R3 is difficult.
yeah right
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:53 am
by Jona
Xenon09 wrote:Jona wrote:But that doesn't make it not replayable. R2 is less replayable than R3, that's definitely the truth. Getting all the lums and cages is not extremely difficult, while getting over 830000 points in R3 is difficult. Which means it takes longer to get, thus you need to play the game more to achieve it, and that means it has a higher replayability value.
Rayman 3 has good replayability the first 5 odd times you play it. After a while I'm sure most of us wouldn't be bothered to improve our scores.
But anyway, if I asked you which Rayman game you would like to play you would more likely say Rayman 2. Am I right.
Of course not. When I play R2 now, I get bored after playing three levels. There's just nothing to do there for me anymore, I played through it 5-10 times and I got all the lums and cages way before. I also know how the environments look like, and now it doesn't have replayability value anymore. Rayman 3 is more replayable, no matter what you think.
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:40 am
by Matyuv
so R2 doesn't have a scoring system at all? wtf
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:56 am
by Jona
Nope, it doesn't. It's a really enjoyable game though.