Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization - Revision history

Spiraldoor: moved Talk:Anti RaymanZone Organization to Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization: This is the grammatically correct form of the name, but feel free to revert if the mistake is important in some way (I can't recall how the members themselves spelt

2011-06-14T11:23:27Z

moved Talk:Anti RaymanZone Organization to Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization: This is the grammatically correct form of the name, but feel free to revert if the mistake is important in some way (I can't recall how the members themselves spelt

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 14 June 2011
(No difference)

Hunchman801: roflwakeuphumch

2011-06-14T08:49:43Z

roflwakeuphumch

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 14 June 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:

	IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged?		IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged?
	:I haven't checked RZ in ages but it probably still exists. You might be new to the community but for old timers ARZO is a very important part of the history of the Rayman community and since ~~it was~~ decided to include community-related stuff in RayWiki, I believe this article is to be kept. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 08:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)		:I haven't checked RZ in ages but it probably still exists. You might be new to the community but for old timers ARZO is a very important part of the history of the Rayman community and since we decided to include community-related stuff in RayWiki, I believe this article is to be kept. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 08:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Hunchman801 at 08:48, 14 June 2011

2011-06-14T08:48:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 14 June 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:

	IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged?		IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged?
			:I haven't checked RZ in ages but it probably still exists. You might be new to the community but for old timers ARZO is a very important part of the history of the Rayman community and since it was decided to include community-related stuff in RayWiki, I believe this article is to be kept. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 08:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

SuperSajuuk: /* Needed? */

2011-06-14T06:59:17Z

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 14 June 2011
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Needed? ==		== Needed? ==

	IMO, this isn't really needed.		IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged?

SuperSajuuk: /* Needed? */ new section

2011-06-14T06:59:01Z

Needed?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 14 June 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)		Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
	:They're not active, but a couple of them have accounts here if I recall correctly. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)		:They're not active, but a couple of them have accounts here if I recall correctly. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

			== Needed? ==

			IMO, this isn't really needed.

Spiraldoor: /* PC */

2011-02-01T19:03:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 1 February 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	==PC==		==PC==
	Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)		Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
			:They're not active, but a couple of them have accounts here if I recall correctly. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

IHeckler9 at 12:47, 1 February 2011

2011-02-01T12:47:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 1 February 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)		I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
	: Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801\|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)		: Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801\|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
			==PC==
			Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Hunchman801 at 14:20, 21 January 2011

2011-01-21T14:20:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 21 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Not sure about this==		==Not sure about this==
	I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)		I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
			: Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801\|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Spiraldoor: Created page with '==Not sure about this== I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they de...'

2011-01-20T18:59:20Z

Created page with '==Not sure about this== I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they de...'

New page

==Not sure about this==
I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)