Talk:Mister Death - Revision history

Boomboleros7: Boomboleros7 moved page Talk:Deadman to Talk:Mister Death: Real name

2014-05-31T21:13:45Z

Boomboleros7 moved page Talk:Deadman to Talk:Mister Death: Real name

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 31 May 2014
(No difference)

Hunchman801 at 13:52, 31 May 2014

2014-05-31T13:52:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 31 May 2014
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:If you read some description, you can see that the Grim Reaper/Deadman has a real name: Mister Death.		:If you read some description, you can see that the Grim Reaper/Deadman has a real name: Mister Death.
	:Everybody is okay to move the page? --[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 18:58, 30 May 2014 (CEST)		:Everybody is okay to move the page? --[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 18:58, 30 May 2014 (CEST)

			::Definitely! —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 15:52, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

Boomboleros7: /* Real name revealed */ new section

2014-05-30T16:58:12Z

Real name revealed: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 30 May 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::::::: Neither tortoises do... and they're neutral. Hmmm... what if we're more specific? we can put "Neutral then Good", right? :D --[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 07:06, 14 April 2012 (CEST)		::::::: Neither tortoises do... and they're neutral. Hmmm... what if we're more specific? we can put "Neutral then Good", right? :D --[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 07:06, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

			== Real name revealed ==

			:In the Windows 8 version of ''Rayman Jungle Run'', you can win 18 achievements. All of them are on that website:
			:[http://www.trueachievements.com/Rayman-Jungle-Run/achievements.htm http://www.trueachievements.com/Rayman-Jungle-Run/achievements.htm]
			:If you read some description, you can see that the Grim Reaper/Deadman has a real name: Mister Death.
			:Everybody is okay to move the page? --[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 18:58, 30 May 2014 (CEST)

Sergiomonty: Sergiomonty moved page Talk:Grim Reaper to Talk:Deadman: The character is also codenamed "Deadman" in Jungle Run. This can't be a coincidence; also, there's no official source indicating that he's the Grim Reaper.

2012-09-29T16:20:40Z

Sergiomonty moved page Talk:Grim Reaper to Talk:Deadman: The character is also codenamed "Deadman" in Jungle Run. This can't be a coincidence; also, there's no official source indicating that he's the Grim Reaper.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 29 September 2012
(No difference)

Sergiomonty at 05:06, 14 April 2012

2012-04-14T05:06:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 14 April 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)		::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

			::::::: Neither tortoises do... and they're neutral. Hmmm... what if we're more specific? we can put "Neutral then Good", right? :D --[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 07:06, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

Haruka at 00:43, 14 April 2012

2012-04-14T00:43:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 14 April 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

Sergiomonty at 21:07, 13 April 2012

2012-04-13T21:07:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 13 April 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)

Spiraldoor at 19:03, 13 April 2012

2012-04-13T19:03:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 13 April 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)

Sergiomonty at 17:06, 13 April 2012

2012-04-13T17:06:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 13 April 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
			:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)

Spiraldoor at 21:56, 11 April 2012

2012-04-11T21:56:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 11 April 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	: I think "neutral" describes this character's stance better, like with Jano. --[[User:Cairnie\|Cairnie]] 21:19, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		: I think "neutral" describes this character's stance better, like with Jano. --[[User:Cairnie\|Cairnie]] 21:19, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	::I believe Jano is a more complex case. Although he accepts to help Rayman to get the Elixir of Life, in the other dimension of the Cave, he attacks Rayman. He also created the Darktoons, which are harmful creatures in both Rayman 1 and RO. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:39, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::I believe Jano is a more complex case. Although he accepts to help Rayman to get the Elixir of Life, in the other dimension of the Cave, he attacks Rayman. He also created the Darktoons, which are harmful creatures in both Rayman 1 and RO. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:39, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
			::Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 14 April 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)		::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

			::::::: Neither tortoises do... and they're neutral. Hmmm... what if we're more specific? we can put "Neutral then Good", right? :D --[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 07:06, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 14 April 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			::::::I would only go for the Neutrality if we consider the fact that the Grim Reaper doesn't let Rayman to enter in the Land of the Livid Dead until he gets all the teeth. But in the other hand, he never attacks Rayman or does anything harmful so for me it isn't any problem staying like a friend. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:43, 14 April 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 13 April 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
	::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			:::::Hmm, err... e_e ... I find that move too radical for a simple situation like this. We haven't got deals with alignments before (maybe with the Knaaren but that was a long time ago), there are too many characters that, in fact, are neutral, and should not be judged neither as friends nor enemies. I suggest to bring more users here to give their thoughts about the Grim Reaper.--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 23:07, 13 April 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 13 April 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)		:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)
			::::I'd rather just leave everything the way it is now. There's a bunch of characters who could be considered borderline neutral, or whose morality is ambiguous. If we start creating categories for neutrality, we're going to open the door for endless arguments about whether the Grim Reaper, Eig, Jano, Axel, Umber, the Magician, the Fakirs (etc... etc...) should be considered neutral. It's much neater to split all characters into 'Enemies' (characters that attack you) and 'Friends' (characters that don't attack you). —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:03, 13 April 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 13 April 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano is simple. He protects his cave but gives up when defeated.--[[User:Yoshidude99\|Yoshidude99]] 22:54, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
	::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)		::Jano both attacks and helps Rayman, so he can accurately be categorised as both an enemy and a friend. The Grim Reaper remains neutral for most of Rayman Origins and becomes helpful at the end, so I think 'friend' is close enough. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 23:56, 11 April 2012 (CEST)
			:::I'm not sure if "Friend" is a good alignment for the Grim Reaper. He basically works for the Livid Dead, and doesn't let Rayman pass for the entire game. Even though he's redeemed, it was just for convenience, as the heroes just helped him to "feed his ego". Also, the heroes can attack (and presumably defeat) him when he opens the dead door. The Grim Reaper doesn't seem to carry a good relationship with Rayman, so that makes him a neutral character. Thoughts?--[[User:Sergiomonty\|Sergiomonty]] 19:06, 13 April 2012 (CEST)