Talk:Psychlops - Revision history

Hunchman801 at 15:03, 9 April 2017

2017-04-09T15:03:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 9 April 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
	:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
			::::You're right, I had already forgotten. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 15:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Haruka at 15:13, 8 April 2017

2017-04-08T15:13:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 8 April 2017
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::Last month, Hunch discovers that although Michaël Janod says that he gives his name to the Psychlops in the ''Rayman 2'' chapter of ''L'Histoire de Rayman'', he actually speaks about the development of ''Rayman Origins''. That's that the paragraph's form suggests.		::Last month, Hunch discovers that although Michaël Janod says that he gives his name to the Psychlops in the ''Rayman 2'' chapter of ''L'Histoire de Rayman'', he actually speaks about the development of ''Rayman Origins''. That's that the paragraph's form suggests.
	::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
			:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Boomboleros7 at 14:14, 8 April 2017

2017-04-08T14:14:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 8 April 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)		Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
	:I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		:I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
			::Hey, you have a bad memory, Hunch!
			::Last month, Hunch discovers that although Michaël Janod says that he gives his name to the Psychlops in the ''Rayman 2'' chapter of ''L'Histoire de Rayman'', he actually speaks about the development of ''Rayman Origins''. That's that the paragraph's form suggests.
			::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hunchman801 at 04:08, 8 April 2017

2017-04-08T04:08:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 8 April 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)		Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
	:~~The small ones already have their article: [[Baby caterpillar]]~~. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 03:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		:I suppose it makes sense, yeah. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 04:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hunchman801 at 03:52, 8 April 2017

2017-04-08T03:52:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 8 April 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)		Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
			:The small ones already have their article: [[Baby caterpillar]]. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 03:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Haruka: Created page with "==Categories== Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures fr..."

2017-04-07T22:17:45Z

Created page with "==Categories== Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures fr..."

New page

==Categories==

Since the Rayman book reveals that these were about to be included in Rayman 2, is it ok to put the Psychlops in the Scrapped Rayman 2 content and Creatures from Rayman 2 categories even though we do not have any visual material from this era? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 22:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 9 April 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		::So the Psychlops aren't scrapped creatures from ''Rayman 2''.--[[User:Boomboleros7\|Boomboleros7]] 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
	:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)		:::So this this means it was a mistake? Ah man. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 15:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
			::::You're right, I had already forgotten. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 15:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)