Talk:Razorbeard - Revision history

Hunchman801 at 16:19, 20 June 2025

2025-06-20T16:19:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 20 June 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	== Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance ==		== Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance ==

	Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?		Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?
	Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)		Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)

	:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)		:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

	::I'd be okay with removing it. Because it really isn't more than a Fun Factoid the writer put in and from the perspective of a reader I found it a little jarring. My first thought was to move it to the Trivia section as to not omit it, but if you're willing to prune it. I encourage it. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 4:54, June 19 2025 (UTC)		::I'd be okay with removing it. Because it really isn't more than a Fun Factoid the writer put in and from the perspective of a reader I found it a little jarring. My first thought was to move it to the Trivia section as to not omit it, but if you're willing to prune it. I encourage it. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 4:54, June 19 2025 (UTC)

			:::Sure, I just removed it.—[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 16:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Archvile: /* Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance */

2025-06-19T05:00:03Z

Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 19 June 2025
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?		Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?
	Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[~~File~~:~~mask1.png~~\|~~32px~~]][[~~User~~:Archvile\|~~Archvile~~]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)		Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)
	:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)		:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

			::I'd be okay with removing it. Because it really isn't more than a Fun Factoid the writer put in and from the perspective of a reader I found it a little jarring. My first thought was to move it to the Trivia section as to not omit it, but if you're willing to prune it. I encourage it. --[[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile\|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png\|32px]] 4:54, June 19 2025 (UTC)

Hunchman801 at 10:21, 18 June 2025

2025-06-18T10:21:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 18 June 2025
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?		Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?
	Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[File:mask1.png\|32px]][[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)		Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[File:mask1.png\|32px]][[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)
			:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|class=sprite\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Archvile: /* Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance */ new section

2025-06-17T00:25:20Z

Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 17 June 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:Never noticed that, might be worth using the main one in the template and including the N64 one somewhere else in the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 00:50, 1 June 2014 (CEST)		:Never noticed that, might be worth using the main one in the template and including the N64 one somewhere else in the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 00:50, 1 June 2014 (CEST)

			== Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance ==

			Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal?
			Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[File:mask1.png\|32px]][[User:Archvile\|Archvile]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT)

Hunchman801: Hunchman801 moved page Talk:Admiral Razorbeard to Talk:Razorbeard

2025-01-02T10:46:34Z

Hunchman801 moved page Talk:Admiral Razorbeard to Talk:Razorbeard

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 2 January 2025
(No difference)

Hunchman801 at 22:50, 31 May 2014

2014-05-31T22:50:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 31 May 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Main Char Image ==		== Main Char Image ==
	Might seem nitpicky, but should we replace the main image with one that features the design featured in most of the versions? As it stands, the image we're using is of N64 Razor, with the hammer and spanner insteads of the crossed swords. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 18:26, 31 May 2014 (CEST)		Might seem nitpicky, but should we replace the main image with one that features the design featured in most of the versions? As it stands, the image we're using is of N64 Razor, with the hammer and spanner insteads of the crossed swords. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 18:26, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

			:Never noticed that, might be worth using the main one in the template and including the N64 one somewhere else in the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 00:50, 1 June 2014 (CEST)

Master at 16:26, 31 May 2014

2014-05-31T16:26:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 31 May 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:

	There are no direct evidences but I highly believe that Razorbeard was inspired in Napoleon Bonaparte. They share many things in common, including the height-factor (I also believe Napoleon was sensitive about his height). Could it be written the possibility of the character being inspired in that identity? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 20:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)		There are no direct evidences but I highly believe that Razorbeard was inspired in Napoleon Bonaparte. They share many things in common, including the height-factor (I also believe Napoleon was sensitive about his height). Could it be written the possibility of the character being inspired in that identity? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 20:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

			== Main Char Image ==
			Might seem nitpicky, but should we replace the main image with one that features the design featured in most of the versions? As it stands, the image we're using is of N64 Razor, with the hammer and spanner insteads of the crossed swords. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 18:26, 31 May 2014 (CEST)

Hunchman801: Removed protection from "Talk:Admiral Razorbeard"

2014-02-18T11:13:02Z

Removed protection from "Talk:Admiral Razorbeard"

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:13, 18 February 2014
(No difference)

Haruka: /* Inspiration for the character */ new section

2011-12-15T20:08:39Z

Inspiration for the character: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 15 December 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Lums==		==Lums==
	In Rayman 2, Razorbeard eats a Yellow/Red Lum. In Rayman 3 for the GBA he tries eating a Black Lum to 'gain its power'. Do you think maybe eating Lums gives him different powers, like the Yellow Lums would make him smarter, Red Lums would make him more resillient etc? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 15:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)		In Rayman 2, Razorbeard eats a Yellow/Red Lum. In Rayman 3 for the GBA he tries eating a Black Lum to 'gain its power'. Do you think maybe eating Lums gives him different powers, like the Yellow Lums would make him smarter, Red Lums would make him more resillient etc? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 15:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

			== Inspiration for the character ==

			There are no direct evidences but I highly believe that Razorbeard was inspired in Napoleon Bonaparte. They share many things in common, including the height-factor (I also believe Napoleon was sensitive about his height). Could it be written the possibility of the character being inspired in that identity? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 20:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

IHeckler9 at 15:41, 8 January 2011

2011-01-08T15:41:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 8 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	NO		NO

			==Lums==
			In Rayman 2, Razorbeard eats a Yellow/Red Lum. In Rayman 3 for the GBA he tries eating a Black Lum to 'gain its power'. Do you think maybe eating Lums gives him different powers, like the Yellow Lums would make him smarter, Red Lums would make him more resillient etc? [[User:Iheckler9\|Iheckler9]] 15:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC)