Template talk:RPCSites - Revision history

Haruka at 23:30, 30 April 2014

2014-04-30T23:30:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 30 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
	:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::I think that the arrow icons don't bite (the eyes). --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:30, 1 May 2014 (CEST)

Hunchman801 at 11:15, 30 April 2014

2014-04-30T11:15:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 30 April 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
	::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)

Master at 07:11, 30 April 2014

2014-04-30T07:11:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 30 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:No, that's never done. Navboxes are solely for the bidirectional navigation of articles. External links are generally confined to an "External links" section at the bottom of some articles.		:No, that's never done. Navboxes are solely for the bidirectional navigation of articles. External links are generally confined to an "External links" section at the bottom of some articles.
	:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
			::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)

Spiraldoor: /* External Links */

2014-04-30T00:27:07Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 30 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== External Links ==		== External Links ==
	I don't know standard Wiki procedure, but I'd assume it's not good practice to have external links on Nav template, right? --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 01:25, 29 April 2014 (CEST)		I don't know standard Wiki procedure, but I'd assume it's not good practice to have external links on Nav template, right? --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 01:25, 29 April 2014 (CEST)
			:No, that's never done. Navboxes are solely for the bidirectional navigation of articles. External links are generally confined to an "External links" section at the bottom of some articles.
			:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)

Master: Created page with "== External Links == I don't know standard Wiki procedure, but I'd assume it's not good practice to have external links on Nav template, right? --~~~~"

2014-04-28T23:25:41Z

Created page with "== External Links == I don't know standard Wiki procedure, but I'd assume it's not good practice to have external links on Nav template, right? --~~~~"

New page

== External Links ==
I don't know standard Wiki procedure, but I'd assume it's not good practice to have external links on Nav template, right? --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 01:25, 29 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 30 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
	:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::I think that the arrow icons don't bite (the eyes). --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:30, 1 May 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 30 April 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		:That's not to say that we can't do it here, but it's certainly unusual. It strikes me as particularly odd that this template freely mixes article links with external ones though... —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:27, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
	::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)		::As I suspected, should we create articles for these affiliates also then? It seems like the best option to rectify the external linking --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 09:11, 30 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::Not sure minor affiliates deserve an article though. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif\|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png\|link=User:Hunchman801]] 13:15, 30 April 2014 (CEST)