Template talk:Rabbids series - Revision history

Serza5 at 19:25, 23 June 2014

2014-06-23T19:25:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 23 June 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	:::::And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:47, 19 April 2014 (CEST)		:::::And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:47, 19 April 2014 (CEST)

			==Single Mini-game page?==
			Excuse me if this isn't the right place to put this but-

			So i've been looking at the "articles that need work" section and I spotted pages like these : http://raymanpc.com/wiki/en/Bunnies_Are_Oversensitive

			Personally I think that unless there is much much more content we could add to the individual pages then we should move them all into a single page for the mini-games, not necessarily on the game page but on a separate page on their own so that instead of having loads of tiny articles we can have one massive one.

			-- [[User:Serza5\|Serza5]] ([[User talk:Serza5\|talk]]) 21:25, 23 June 2014 (CEST)

Haruka: /* Separation or Accumulation? */

2014-04-19T10:47:59Z

Separation or Accumulation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 19 April 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::::And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:47, 19 April 2014 (CEST)

Spiraldoor: /* Separation or Accumulation? */

2014-04-18T19:32:41Z

Separation or Accumulation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 18 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Master at 19:13, 18 April 2014

2014-04-18T19:13:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 18 April 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Haruka: /* Separation or Accumulation? */

2014-04-18T00:04:14Z

Separation or Accumulation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 18 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)		I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)
	:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Spiraldoor: /* Separation or Accumulation? */

2014-04-17T23:41:09Z

Separation or Accumulation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 17 April 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)		I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)
	:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Spiraldoor: /* Separation or Accumulation? */

2014-04-17T23:40:58Z

Separation or Accumulation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 17 April 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)		I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)
			:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Haruka: Created page with "==Separation or Accumulation?== I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is..."

2014-04-17T21:06:34Z

Created page with "==Separation or Accumulation?== I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is..."

New page

==Separation or Accumulation?==

I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 19 April 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::::And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:47, 19 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 18 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			::::Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 18 April 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor\|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png\|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
	::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)		::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka\|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
			:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)