Talk:Rayman 2

From RayWiki, the Rayman wiki
Revision as of 15:15, 29 March 2019 by Aaron (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Protected articles

Deleting protected articles doesn't work so it seems. This is getting annoying. -- RKartHead.gif StaceyW 18:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

So maybe we should not remove this page, but let it existing and mark as protected? ZuTheSkunk 20:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Demo?

I've done a quick search and scouring, there doesn't appear to be any information about Rayman 2's demos. --Sig5 2TEST.png 17:21, 13 December 2014 (CET)

Reference Collages

I feel that they ought to be moved somewhere else in the article, their current placement seems a little random --Sig5 2TEST.png 01:14, 22 December 2014 (CET)

Slimming down plot section

While Rayman 2 is significantly more plot heavy in comparison with other titles, I do feel that the plot section is extremely bloated and is overdoing it. Do you folks feel that it's prudent to rework the plot section so that it's more synoptic in nature? --Sig5 2TEST.png 00:02, 3 September 2015 (CEST)

Rayman 2 (PlayStation)

I was thinking that we should probably have a separate article for the PlayStation version of the game due to how different it is. Considering we have articles for ports such as the DS and 3DS ones, which were left mostly intact, it would make sense to have one of the PlayStation version as it was basically created from scratch. Playing through the game again now on my PS Vita I'm noticing once again just how far the changes go with the port.

So, any input on the matter? I'd be happy to create the page myself if we decide that we should make it. I'm thinking about having it in a similar manner of Rayman (Atari Jaguar). --Carrot signature.png 20:29, 26 March 2019 (CET)

Sounds like a good idea to me. :) --Ray RayWiki sig.png 22:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Done. Would be nice to have the development studio verified though since the credits don't seem to mention the studio by name. --Carrot signature.png 09:52, 27 March 2019 (CET)
Good idea, this version is definitely worthy of an article. —RRRGBAIcon8.pngRRRGBAIcon0.gifRRRGBAIcon1.png 11:24, 27 March 2019 (CET)
I do agree, I wouldn't have thought of that myself, it was a great idea. --Magician hat Origins.pngAaron 11:29, 27 March 2019 (CET)