Review The User Above You!

[rolesfamily]

PluMGMK

Good: Nice guy, good fun to post with

Bad: Likes Tily, and also has too many random caps in his name!

[iHeckler9]

iHeckler9

Good: Friendly, is one of the few people to still have a "current rank" in their signature.

Bad: Inactive, can't seem to keep that "current rank" in sync with their own rank!

When I have to donate to my other account every two days it gets a bit annoying. Cut me a break here brah
And roles, what's so bad about Tily? She's pretty cool.

[rolesfamily]

Always found her a bit of an odd character Just sort of one to fill in a gap of Rayman M. Never really did it for me.

[Snagglebee]

rolesfamily
Good: Awsome dude with an attitude.
Bad: A pain in the ass if he got more time to post more than me W_W

[Master]

Em
Good: A well valued contributor who started off rocky, but has become a well valued member, and has been a great help to RPC and the fandom at large with his efforts on patching, and for keeping RPC's German Forums active. I'm proud to see how much you've grown.

Bad: At one year younger than me, you've accomplished quite a bit, I'm a bit envious, in fact

[Xenon]

Master.

Good: excellent mod and manager of TTQ.

Bad: every time I write his name it feels like he's my superior. >:(

Are these supposed to be serious reviews? Or is there supposed some element of humour, like in ban the member above, where we can just insult each other and claim it's all in good spirit?

[Bradandez]

It can go both ways.

Xenon

Good: Has a cool username.

Bad: Didn't know how this game worked.

[Hoozang]

Xenon, it doesn't really matter! You can be helpful, or be a total jerk! You decide!

Bradandez

Good: Cool signature.

Bad: He's more crazy than me, he stole my job.

Thanks to Rolesfamily for helping with the layout of the game.

[rolesfamily]

Sugar

Good: Stays active on this forum, and keeps changing his profile to keep it f-f-f-f-fresh!

Bad: Has a pretty dodgy looking rank LOL a rank rank

[Hoozang]

Rolesfamily

Good: Been posting a lot in this topic

Bad: Maybe too much....

[Adsolution]

Sugar-

Good: a fun, curious fellow
Bad: A hypocrite, having posted in this topic almost as much as rolesfamily

Are these supposed to be serious reviews? Or is there supposed some element of humour, like in ban the member above, where we can just insult each other and claim it's all in good spirit?

I kind of wish there was a little more seriousness in these games, it makes them more interesting (I wanted to say less boring, but that sounded too negative).

[Rayfist]

Adsolution:

Good: Nothing, he's bad.
Bad: He has no style, nor grace, some say he has a funny face.

[rolesfamily]

Rayfist

Good: Seems well informed, has a brilliant sig, and has a lot of RPC 'street cred'

Bad: Can fall into a bit of the 'hard-ass' bracket on this forum

[Rayfist]

'hard-ass'

I think you mean Candy ass


Jokes aside though I'm trying to refrain from that lol.

Roles

Good: Seems like a swell guy
Bad: Said Wrath Of Cortex was a bad game.

[rolesfamily]

Rayfist

Good: Has a sense of humor as it seems! haha - and also takes constructive criticism well!

Bad: Is into WOC a bit more than I'm comfortable with LOL

[Hoozang]

Rolesfamily

Good: Nice guy, very friendly

Bad: I don't know what's your Steam Profile so I can add you !

[GOT4N]

He loves teh sugarrrr

[Rulez]

GOT4N:

good: 's a nice guy

bad: doesn't fucking understand the rules of this game

[Pirez]

Forez :

Good : has a wicked sign

Bad : has a username that ends just like mine.

[Snagglebee]

Pirez:

Good: Pointing out good statements about other users.
Bad: Pointing out bad statements about other usuers.