SOTM#170 - Rayman Legends

For all things related to Pirate-Community and its websites.
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Bradandez »

I'm feeling agitated by that :)
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Imco97 wrote:emotionless smile
:boon:
Jewish Candy
Creveton (good)
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
Tings: 28664

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Jewish Candy »

Unfortunately, I must disagree with Shroob. In speech and in person, we use intonation and body language extensively, and as the language moves further into the written sphere new methods to express pragmatic information are necessary. Smileys are one of those methods. Interpreting said information from plain text is a useful one indeed, but the colloquial is not dry and I see no reason why we should insist on reducing the potential for pragmatic expression.

I like this discussion on smileys. :)
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Yes but doesn't it get sad when you need smileys to interpret someone's post, or when you start seeing smileys that DO represent something as some contrived way of performing some sort of personal attack? Seriously, how can two characters conveying a smiling man indicate a passive-aggressive blow? The hell, man!
Master
Rayman 1
Posts: 53542
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
Tings: 468310

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Master »

Hmm, while I try to limit my emoticon usage, I do use them now and then, usually defensively if I say something that can be easily taken negatively.
Imco
Holly Luya
Posts: 9584
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
Location: Somewhere only we know
Contact:
Tings: 123540

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Imco »

Yeah, I for one seem to find plain text incapable of carrying emotions properly. I don't know, for example, whenever I see a "no." I always think of it as extremely rude. Just like "congratulations.", which for some reason I always interpret as a cynical statement.
Now, if those had been no :), no :(, no :|, no :pascontent: , and congratulations :), congratulations :D, congratulations :pascontent: it'd have been easier to understand, although I must say these might not be the best examples.
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

So when I make a typo or my phone doesn't auto-capitalise one time I'm being an aggressive cunt?
ok
Imco
Holly Luya
Posts: 9584
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
Location: Somewhere only we know
Contact:
Tings: 123540

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Imco »

Shrooblord wrote:So when I make a typo or my phone doesn't auto-capitalise one time I'm being an aggressive cunt?
ok
In my book you are XD, although I'm also perfectly capable of telling my mind this is all bullshit. Which I do, way too often.
(ughh, I hate my brain sometimes)
I think this also has to do with the argument I had with BadGuy lately, about me not being able to correctly interpret his ironic remarks.
Master
Rayman 1
Posts: 53542
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
Tings: 468310

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Master »

Meh, I wouldn't really read much into such simple statements like that, if they're vague and ambiguous then they're vague and ambiguous, it's not very healthy to take things negatively all the time.
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Amen to that. Why not accept things at face values? If they later turn out to be negatives, so be it, sucks man. But if they never were yet you worried about them, you've gone and ruined your day worrying about nothing.
Imco
Holly Luya
Posts: 9584
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
Location: Somewhere only we know
Contact:
Tings: 123540

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Imco »

Shrooblord wrote:Amen to that. Why not accept things at face values? If they later turn out to be negatives, so be it, sucks man. But if they never were yet you worried about them, you've gone and ruined your day worrying about nothing.
Like I said, tell that to my brain. I know perfectly well what you mean, but my first interpretation, which most of the time isn't a final interpretation, seems to be negative way too often.
Jewish Candy
Creveton (good)
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
Tings: 28664

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Jewish Candy »

It can be hard if you're wired that way, so it's all about training your brain to identify where and why it reacts like it does. Anxiety, eh, it's a total butt.

@Shroob, think about it this way; we can interpret most utterances from context, but sometimes we need a little extra information. Sometimes, yes, we need to roll our eyes or speak in a flat tone so that people understand we're being sarcastic etc. Smileys, things like /sarcasm, all ways of giving that information in text form. And, of course, some people need that extra info more than others.
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Sure. Since I've started this conversation, I've come to realise I was overreacting a bit. It was just that I'm seeing less and less people being able to not use smileys in their sentences and it bugs me. I don't know why. Maybe I'm just antsy for no reason.
Master
Rayman 1
Posts: 53542
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
Tings: 468310

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Master »

Funnily enough, I remember another member getting a little irked over smiley usage. I ought to search about and see what I can find.
Imco
Holly Luya
Posts: 9584
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
Location: Somewhere only we know
Contact:
Tings: 123540

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Imco »

I just hope Serza won't forget to review my submission, lost somewhere in this conversation XD
MrBadGuy
Stone man
Posts: 6170
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: dicktopia
Tings: 2067

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by MrBadGuy »

Imco97 wrote:the argument I had with BadGuy lately
All I know is, I haven't had an argument with anyone on this forum in recent memory, maybe pre-2011, but I honestly can't remember that far back
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Bradandez »

Oops, forgot to say thanks for the nice comments about my signature entry. Thanks y'all!
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Absolutely - it looks gorgeous. I wonder what the spikes are near the Elemesque character's chin are though. They look beard.
Jewish Candy
Creveton (good)
Posts: 7031
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
Tings: 28664

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Jewish Candy »

That's his hair, Shrup. XD
Or perhaps a beak with a tongue sticking out. Can't unsee it

Did I comment on Imco's entry yet? It's a very nice one :o
Shrooblord
Mr Stone
Posts: 15762
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
Tings: 68850

Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle

Post by Shrooblord »

Oh of course, the back of his hair! I'm a dolt.
Post Reply