I mean, we'll see at E3, but I would like to avoid being in that kind of mood:
"OW YEAH, THEY ANOUNCED A NEW 3D RAMEN!"
Wait...it's another Assassin's Creed...
saerleiya wrote:There are so many franchises Ubisoft could use now that the probability of this game being actually a Rayman one is pretty low.
I mean, we'll see at E3, but I would like to avoid being in that kind of mood:
"OW YEAH, THEY ANOUNCED A NEW 3D RAMEN!"
Wait...it's another Assassin's Creed...
Now that I've read this question throughly, I'll answer properly. And what I'm gonna type out is from VARIOUS sources. So I'm not trying to point out members, okay? Not gonna name names (Rayfist, bitch >:c).PluMGMK wrote:What exactly makes a 3D game more entitled to be called "Rayman 4"?


What should it be called then?Bradandez wrote:The cancelled Rayman 4 looked great going by the concept art! I definitely wouldn't mind it either. Just don't call it Rayman 4.

What?Bradandez wrote:(Rayfist, bitch >:c).

I don't get why people make that out to be a bad thing. Sure, the company's executives' core motivation is to raise more cash, but the reason Assassin's Creed raises more cash is because it appeals to a larger percentage of the gaming community. Hypothetically, if Rayman was a popular franchise, and high-quality games were being released "every 48 hours," I don't think you'd have the same stance.Netaro wrote:Well, Ubisoft is good at spewing out Assassin's Creed games every 48 hours...
I actually completely agree with that sentiment. It's idiotic to limit yourself to such a narrow scope in terms of what's an "acceptable" sequel, especially since the Rayman franchise doesn't really seem to have a set "mood" for its games in the first place. Since Origins and Legends worked in the mood they were going for, they have a place in the franchise. I highly doubt Rayfist disagrees with that just because he prefers a different game.Bradandez wrote:Rayman 4 must be:
- 3D Platformer
- Serious, No Tom-foolery nonsense
- Story with dark, brooding atmosphere
- Pretend like Origins and Legends never happen
- Has to be like Rayman 2, may be like Rayman 3
- No Rabbids either
And that's about it. :p

There's clearly been a massive decline in the quality of the AC series, Unity was a broken mess, along with a very bland 2D sidescroller set in China, and Syndicate will likely end up being the same old thing. Either way, it's what sells so, it's understandable why they'll pump the franchise for everything it's worth. Only one's I'm interested in playing are 2 and 4.Technology4617 wrote:I don't get why people make that out to be a bad thing.

I'm moreso referring to people that complain about it simply because it sells, without having any real practical reason to dislike it.Rayfist wrote:There's clearly been a massive decline in the quality of the AC series, Unity was a broken mess, along with a very bland 2D sidescroller set in China, and Syndicate will likely end up being the same old thing. Either way, it's what sells so, it's understandable why they'll pump the franchise for everything it's worth. Only one's I'm interested in playing are 2 and 4.


Nah, I'm aware, was just some food for thought for interesting discussion since Ad brought up an interesting topic here.Technology4617 wrote:I'm moreso referring to people that complain about it simply because it sells, without having any real practical reason to dislike it.
fuk uRayfist wrote:What?Bradandez wrote:(Rayfist, bitch >:c).
That's why I put the disclaimer of the list I made came from VARIOUS sources. I'm not trying McCarthy this forum up, which ol' RayFisty accuses me of doing.technology4617 wrote:I highly doubt Rayfist disagrees with that just because he prefers a different game.
Bradandez wrote:Now that I've read this question throughly, I'll answer properly. And what I'm gonna type out is from VARIOUS sources. So I'm not trying to point out members, okay? Not gonna name names (Rayfist, bitch >:c).PluMGMK wrote:What exactly makes a 3D game more entitled to be called "Rayman 4"?
Rayman 4 must be:
- 3D Platformer
- Serious, No Tom-foolery nonsense
- Story with dark, brooding atmosphere
- Pretend like Origins and Legends never happen
- Has to be like Rayman 2, may be like Rayman 3
- No Rabbids either
And that's about it. :p

lolNetaro wrote:THANK YOU! Finally, someone speaks the truth. However, Legends was a pretty good game.Bradandez wrote:
Must... Resist... Making... Dickish Sarcistic Comment!Netaro wrote:THANK YOU! Finally, someone speaks the truth. However, Legends was a pretty good game.
I am thoroughly disappointed that this post probably isn't a joke.Netaro wrote:THANK YOU! Finally, someone speaks the truth. However, Legends was a pretty good game.

Netaro wrote:THANK YOU! Finally, someone speaks the truth. However, Legends was a pretty good game.