+ Got the Rain Mask as well.





what were theyAaron wrote:- I got 2 terrible games for Christmas
Medal of Honor: Vanguard (I honestly don't know how my dad expected me to play a 16+ game when I'm only 13) and Dirt Track Devils.Adsolution wrote:what were they

What do you mean how? Does it feel unethical for you to try playing a 16+ game before you're 16? Because age ratings don't mean that people under the written age shouldn't play them, it only means that it's up to the parents until you're that age, and if your dad got it for you, then that's completely within the scope of the age rating's intended purpose.Aaron wrote:I honestly don't know how my dad expected me to play a 16+ game when I'm only 13
No problem, just when someone asks me a question, wait for my reply to that person and then post next time!THEdragon wrote:You may have posted in the wrong thread, Aaron? Just put a - in front of that paragraph and it'll fit fine though.
EDIT: If that was the case, I've just prevented you from being able to delete the post by posting after you. Whoops! Sorry Aaron!

I agree Medal of Honor is pretty lame, but what you just said is flat-out wrong. You've obviously never really played or understood a shooter before; in fact, I'd say that shooters are one of the most varied genres out there due to them relying on such a simple and accessible but flexible and addicting concept that anyone can grasp which, combined with the fact they're in first-person, creates the greatest link between ourselves and the player, leading to some of the most fast-paced and skillful gameplay around. The genre has existed all throughout time, from 1990 to today and has never dipped in popularity for a very good reason. Disregarding its merit is just as bad as if not worse than disregarding the platforming genre as a whole.Aaron wrote:What do you do in a shooting game? Just shoot, shoot, shoot at the enemy. There's no variety in them.


To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer’s head. There’s also Rick’s nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they’re not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn’t appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick’s existential catchphrase “Wubba Lubba Dub Dub,” which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev’s Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I’m smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon’s genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them.Adsolution wrote:You've obviously never really played or understood a shooter before; in fact, I'd say that shooters are one of the most varied genres out there due to them relying on such a simple and accessible but flexible and addicting concept that anyone can grasp which, combined with the fact they're in first-person, creates the greatest link between ourselves and the player, leading to some of the most fast-paced and skillful gameplay around. The genre has existed all throughout time, from 1990 to today and has never dipped in popularity for a very good reason. Disregarding its merit is just as bad as if not worse than disregarding the platforming genre as a whole.
I know you're only thirteen and I had my fair share of irrational biases back then too, but you really have to be a little more honest in your approach to criticising one of the pioneering video game genres!
