The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo!
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before.
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit.
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED.
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo! :lol:
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before. :fou:
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit. :P
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED. :fou:
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year :lol:
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo!
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before.
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit.
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED.
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though.
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo! :lol:
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before. :fou:
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit. :P
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED. :fou:
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year :lol:
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though. :tssk: :fou:
At least you can check though, I'll probably never see mine until the end, haha.
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo!
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before.
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit.
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED.
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though.
At least you can check though, I'll probably never see mine until the end, haha.
Well, I just searched my own posts, which you can do too. But it can be strongly argued that such time would be better spent posting.
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo!
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before.
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit.
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED.
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though.
At least you can check though, I'll probably never see mine until the end, haha.
Well, I just searched my own posts, which you can do too. But it can be strongly argued that such time would be better spent posting.
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo! :lol:
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before. :fou:
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit. :P
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED. :fou:
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year :lol:
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though. :tssk: :fou:
At least you can check though, I'll probably never see mine until the end, haha.
Well, I just searched my own posts, which you can do too. But it can be strongly argued that such time would be better spent posting. :P
Mine says 200, not sure how many I have though.
Mine says 87 after some random amount of posts, it is definitely broken lol
The Jonster wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:13 am
I don't feel like thinking about my post count. But only 9 plum? You must be even slower than Steo!
Either Plum or the counter was drinking beer.
Well it wasn't me. *sniff*
I must be missing something regarding the counter.
It's called "upgrading phpBB without making sure RD works". It's happened before.
It doesn't look broken to me, unless I'm being an eejit.
It misses a post here and there everysooften. Mine says 19 now and it could well still say 19 when I post this (but it might also say 20).
EDIT: It still says 19. QED.
Mine is saying 84. Wow I'm really going slow this year
I've checked and my real count is just over 40. Since the new search engine has a latency associated with it, I can't see what the exact number is that way either though.
At least you can check though, I'll probably never see mine until the end, haha.
Well, I just searched my own posts, which you can do too. But it can be strongly argued that such time would be better spent posting.
Mine says 200, not sure how many I have though.
Mine says 87 after some random amount of posts, it is definitely broken lol
PluMGMK wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:42 am
Maybe it's more broken for some of us than for others.
Also, when the centres of the pyramids turn black it's probably time to call it quits on them.
What does it mean when the pyramids turn black? That the text will start being all scrunched? Just curious.
It means we've gone past the number of layers which the stylesheet author bothered to code for, colour-wise. As a corollary to that, we've also probably made navigating the page excessively inconvenient, with all the scrolling needed…
PluMGMK wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:47 am
It means we've gone past the number of layers which the stylesheet author bothered to code for, colour-wise. :P As a corollary to that, we've also probably made navigating the page excessively inconvenient, with all the scrolling needed…
Steo wrote: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:46 am
There's too many posts and your device can no longer display them.
These could both very well be correct. Although I have to agree with the "excessively incovenient" pages :oops2: