List of ranks

Xenon · Post by **Xenon** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:42 pm

Not really. Like you said, who's going to get the most amount of Tings possible?

I don't see how I could have misunderstood this. The highest amount (is there is one) would be something like 9999999999999999999999, and I seriously doubt anyone will get such an amount.

Shawn · Post by **Shawn** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:45 pm

But if someone ever does, they should be awarded with the gift of custom rank.

Xenon · Post by **Xenon** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:57 pm

It will take hundreds of years for anyone to reach 99999999999999999999 Tings, so I don't see the point.

Shawn · Post by **Shawn** » Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:34 pm

I doubt that's the limit.

Post by **Hunchman801** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:11 am

The maximum amount is 99.999.999.999 Tings, but I can easily change it by modifying the database structure. Anyway, no one will ever reach that limit.

Acarr · Post by **Acarr** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:12 am

I'll never reach that ammount

Shawn · Post by **Shawn** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:14 am

You act like it's impossible, but it isn't. If it was, why would the limit exist?

Acarr · Post by **Acarr** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:15 am

I dare you to get that many Shawn

I'll even help you.

Shawn · Post by **Shawn** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:27 am

LET'S DO IT!!

Tobbe · Post by **Tobbe** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:50 am

If you continue posting at your current rate (ca. 10 000 tings pr. month) it will take you approximately 800 000 years to get that amount of tings.

EDIT: Roughly calculated.

Post by **Hunchman801** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:53 am

Shawn wrote:You act like it's impossible, but it isn't. If it was, why would the limit exist?

You don't know anything about database structure

If you did, you would understand why limits have to be set up. And anyway, it's totally impossible to reach it by posting

Jman · Post by **Jman** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:39 am

Well... it's impossible to reach with normal posts and not spam.

Post by **Hunchman801** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:51 am

I'm not sure you understand: even if you posted one message every second, it would take you more than six hundred years.

Jman · Post by **Jman** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:28 am

Oh my god! You're right, just now hit me how much that was.

El Dango · Post by **El Dango** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:57 pm

If only there was a way to post 500.000 messages in 1 nano-second...

Mountain Goat · Post by **Mountain Goat** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:05 pm

Well, you can reckon how long it needs when you post so much messages in a nano-second.
Well, you could develope a Bot, which has the option to pollute the community quickly with Spam.

Xenon · Post by **Xenon** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:26 pm

As far as I see it there's only one way to have such an amount of Tings, and that would be for either Hunchman or myself to edit users' amounts.

But we aren't going to

Tobbe · Post by **Tobbe** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 5:04 pm

El Dango wrote:If only there was a way to post 500.000 messages in 1 nano-second...

I posted 130 messages in 30 seconds on record day, but that was due to a glitch in the forum system.

Joshua822 · Post by **Joshua822** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:35 pm

Well, isn't because every attribute in the MySQL table has a character maximum ?

Post by **Hunchman801** » Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:42 pm

It's the case for INT values

Rayman Pirate-Community

List of ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks

Re: Ranks