Please introduce yourself here

[Holy Crap]

If you really did "strongly suspect" me, then why did you give no indication of it?

If you must know, I didn't want to go wildly pointing the finger at people. Why does it bother you so much that I suspected you?

That's a stupid way to come to a conclusion, and as a result your conclusion is completely false.

You think that something is automatically "completely false" because it's found out by unreliable methods? Logic not.

Not automatically. It was completely false, and I'm pretty sure this is a result of your faulty reasoning. How is this not logical?

[spiraldoor]

If you really did "strongly suspect" me, then why did you give no indication of it?

If you must know, I didn't want to go wildly pointing the finger at people. Why does it bother you so much that I suspected you?

How is naming one person in speculation as to the identity of the 1000th member the same as "wildly pointing the finger at people"? Several other people made multiple guesses; what's one more? After all, you did "strongly suspect" me, did you not? And it doesn't "bother me that you suspected me". I doubt you did at all. This is, after all, my point.

That's a stupid way to come to a conclusion, and as a result your conclusion is completely false.

You think that something is automatically "completely false" because it's found out by unreliable methods? Logic not.

Not automatically. It was completely false, and I'm pretty sure this is a result of your faulty reasoning. How is this not logical?

That is not what you said the first time. What you initially said was that my conclusion was "completely false" solely because it was reached through the use of means which you viewed to be inaccurate and "stupid", while a little rational thinking demonstrates that this is by no means the case. For example, 'Eeny, meeny, miny, moe' is a rather inacurate, if not "stupid" method for making a decision, but this does not automatically and infallibly result in an unfavourable or inaccurate outcome. Were there other factors influencing your conclusion then you should have specified them.

~*kekeke*

[Hunchman801]

What you initially said was that my conclusion was "completely false" solely because it was reached through the use of means which you viewed to be inaccurate and "stupid", while a little rational thinking demonstrates that this is by no means the case.

All he tried to say is that a stupid reasoning had very little chances to lead you to a valuable conclusion

[spiraldoor]

What you initially said was that my conclusion was "completely false" solely because it was reached through the use of means which you viewed to be inaccurate and "stupid", while a little rational thinking demonstrates that this is by no means the case.

All he tried to say is that a stupid reasoning had very little chances to lead you to a valuable conclusion

He failed to acknowledge the existence of those "very little chances" in his post above.

[Holy Crap]

Spiral, I'd like to point out that as you continue to drag this out, you look more and more like a complete dick. In any case, you MIGHT survive a nuclear explosion, but people don't tend to dwell on that.

[spiraldoor]

Spiral, I'd like to point out that as you continue to drag this out, you look more and more like a complete dick. In any case, you MIGHT survive a nuclear explosion, but people don't tend to dwell on that.

If this is meant to be your response to the second post of this page, I must confess myself disappointed. Scarcely even referencing the subject of the discussion, you said that you'd "like to point out to me" (padding) that I was "dragging this out" (ignoring the fact that you are doing the same, as is Hunch to a lesser extent), threw a mild and unsubstantiated insult at me (the term "complete dick" was used at this point), and tossed in an extra sentence (attempt at humour?) about surviving a nuclear explosion, and people not tending to "dwell" on it... as if I had suggesed that such was the case. Really, if that's all you had to say then you might as well not have bothered.

~I suppose one could say that I've 'won' this argument by default (given that you've completely stopped pursuing it), but this is a shallow victory indeed.

[Tobbe]

Spiral, I'd like to point out that as you continue to drag this out, you look more and more like a complete dick.

QFT

[spiraldoor]

Spiral, I'd like to point out that as you continue to drag this out, you look more and more like a complete dick.

QFT

Yeah... don't say anything clever, whatever you do.

[MLII]

QFT...?

[PluMGMK]

I would also like to know what it means.

[Acarr]

If you don't understand what something means, then go on Google or something. It means, Quite Fucking True (or Quoted For Truth).

[MLII]

I see, I see.

I LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY 8D

[PluMGMK]

Quite Fucking True

I had kinda guessed that, but I wanted to make sure.

[spiraldoor]

If you don't understand what something means, then go on Google or something. It means, Quite Fucking True (or Quoted For Truth).

QFT

I see, I see.

I LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY 8D

QFT

Quite Fucking True

I had kinda guessed that, but I wanted to make sure.

QFT

[Puruun]

QFT...?

I would also like to know what it means.

If you don't understand what something means, then go on Google or something. It means, Quite Fucking True (or Quoted For Truth).

I suggest Urban Dictionary ^-^

[Matyuv]

Oh yes, Urban Dictionary helped me out much when I was new to the english internets.

[Romagia]

I'm romagia.

[Hunchman801]

I'm romagia.

Welcome.

[Tobbe]

Welcome, romagia!

Spiral, I'd like to point out that as you continue to drag this out, you look more and more like a complete dick.

QFT

Yeah... don't say anything clever, whatever you do.

...

...you look more and more like a complete dick.

[MLII]

I'm romagia.

Hello Romagia. :p I'm Domi. Beware: Most of my posts make no sense.