Off Topic

ikke471 · Post by **ikke471** » Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:03 pm

Rulez wrote:Guys

Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.

XD goomba run!!!!

Rayman3DS · Post by **Rayman3DS** » Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:23 pm

Rulez wrote:Guys

Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.

That's awesome1!!

Rulez · Post by **Rulez** » Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:25 pm

Rayman3DS wrote:
Rulez wrote:Guys

Me and Bart/Trololo and Fat_Mario are making a webcomic about games
Cliché but nice
And here's a first version http://gamingbunch.thecomicseries.com/
It's totally not finished obviously; Bart is coloring it now and he's doing a beautiful job as an inker, colorer etc.
That's awesome1!!

Thanks.
It still is ugly but when Bart's done with coloring, it will really look pretty; trust me, he's good at such things

And I'm the artist who does sketches and scans them.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:06 pm

Puruun wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:
Puruun wrote:This is why I don't want Spiral to be a mod.
Because I said something that made sense?
No, because of the arguments you get involved in.

Are you saying that moderators should not get involved in arguments?

Louvis · Post by **Louvis** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:40 pm

spiraldoor wrote:
Puruun wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:
Puruun wrote:This is why I don't want Spiral to be a mod.
Because I said something that made sense?
No, because of the arguments you get involved in.
Are you saying that moderators should not get involved in arguments?

Sorry spiral, but that's... ugh.

Absolutely no, moderators should not argue with users. They should be more like... peacemakers. Of course, that doesn't mean that moderators cannot have their own opinions about something, or fool around with other users, but... there are limits (known also as forum regulations, for example, or rules, however you call it), Palmitodamnit.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:01 pm

Louvis wrote: Sorry spiral, but that's... ugh.

Absolutely no, moderators should not argue with users. They should be more like... peacemakers. Of course, that doesn't mean that moderators cannot have their own opinions about something, or fool around with other users, but... there are limits (known also as forum regulations, for example, or rules, however you call it), Palmitodamnit.

Tobbe argued with several members in the religion thread yesterday. Are you saying that he should not be allowed to disagree? Or that he should be demoted?

Could someone please explain exactly where I ‘crossed the line’ and my posts in this thread became unforgivably argumentative? I would also like to know why I am personally being targeted while Rayfan, another candidate who participated in the ‘argument’, is being ignored.

iambored2006 · Post by **iambored2006** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:20 pm

I have no problem with your posts. Argue all you want. I also have no problem with mods arguing. There's something about you being a mod that makes me uneasy. Don't get me wrong, it's nothing against you. I just don't think you're a moderator kind of guy.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:29 pm

So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.

iambored2006 · Post by **iambored2006** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:23 pm

spiraldoor wrote:So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.

What?! No! I just don't see you as a moderator, just like I don't see Steven Spielberg as an FBI agent.

Post by **Hunchman801** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:53 pm

iambored2006 wrote:Also, the judges weren't really fare.

Maybe they were actually.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:58 pm

iambored2006 wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:So I give you a vague sense of foreboding? Excellent.
What?! No! I just don't see you as a moderator, just like I don't see Steven Spielberg as an FBI agent.

It is difficult to refute such abstract criticism.

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:19 pm

Still saying he doesn't see you as a moderator as he doesn't see me as a moderator would be grrreat offense.

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:21 pm

stan423321 wrote:Still saying he doesn't see you as a moderator as he doesn't see me as a moderator would be grrreat offense.

Right you are, Stan. Right you are.

iambored2006 · Post by **iambored2006** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:37 pm

Hunchman801 wrote:
iambored2006 wrote:Also, the judges weren't really fare.
Maybe they were actually.

I said that? oops! I was seriously distracted at the moment. I also have a serious case of dysgraphia. I can sometimes forget whole words!

What do you mean, Stan?

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:44 pm

iambored2006 wrote:What do you mean, Stan?

Your guess is as good as mine.

stan423321 · Post by **stan423321** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:48 pm

stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.

Rulez · Post by **Rulez** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:55 pm

stan423321 wrote:
stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.

Am I wothy then? Wothy? Wothy? Wooothyyy?

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 5:57 pm

You see? Stan is tolerated only because he doesn’t try to take over the site.

iambored2006 · Post by **iambored2006** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:02 pm

stan423321 wrote:
stan423321, a member of Rayman Pirate-Community born in 1994 who joined RPC in 2008 is responsible for roughly 0.8% of posts of RPC during his activity periods (which seem to be quite random, as his activity reportedly depends on real-life events). Stan, known for confusing grammar, a very low amount of English vocabulary, and love for potentially senseless posts, is discussably a non-wothy member of RPC; however a few of his statements regarded as examples were ultimately proven to be true, and so is tolerated by majority of English members, especially as he doesn't seem to try to take control of RPC.

Who wrote that? Personally, I vote for ya, man. You do seem like a mod guy. You wouldn't abuse it or anything (not that you would, spiral...).

spiraldoor · Post by **spiraldoor** » Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:06 pm

iambored2006 wrote:You do seem like a mod guy. You wouldn't abuse it or anything (not that you would, spiral...).

You are being very vague and confusing.

Rayman Pirate-Community

Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic

Re: Off Topic