Psychlops wrote:It still looks, squished, but if you fix that, than I'll give you both Tings if you want!
Can you fix it?
EDIT: The deadline for any signatures is tomorrow. Everyone who posted a signature, no matter the quality, will get tings. But whoever's I like most gets even more!
MDT I know I've said this to you many times before, but non-uniformly scaled (squished/stretched) images look just plain bad. The bubbles should be round. The lack of uniform in your sigs is the only thing holding them back. Look at Rayman3DS's sig, all the bubbles are round giving it a much more professional look. But honestly, Rayman3DS is undoubtedly one of the best sig makers I've ever seen. He could make lots f money doing that sort of thing.
Rayman3DS wrote: My sig
Remember to make a little sentence like:
^ Sig made by 3DS ^
Yes! You win! It even has Psychlopses on it! And you actually put the 'BUBBLIZATION!' on it!
How many Tings to you guys want?
Keep you're tings
---------------------------
RayFan9876 wrote:But honestly, Rayman3DS is undoubtedly one of the best sig makers I've ever seen. He could make lots f money doing that sort of thing.
Thanks Rayfan, but I'm only (almost) 13. And I've always been loving Adobe as my father is a graphic designer. He made the Danish Harry Potter 4 cover
RayFan9876 wrote:MDT I know I've said this to you many times before, but non-uniformly scaled (squished/stretched) images look just plain bad. The bubbles should be round. The lack of uniform in your sigs is the only thing holding them back. Look at Rayman3DS's sig, all the bubbles are round giving it a much more professional look. But honestly, Rayman3DS is undoubtedly one of the best sig makers I've ever seen. He could make lots f money doing that sort of thing.
i forgot to scale the sig background to the rigt size and i was already done, so that was the reason,it's really better if you see the original, wait i gonna upload it
EDIT:
this actually wasn't even my original idea, i just maked for the fun that globox and i pretty like it, but the rest wasn't supper nice
RayFan9876 wrote:MDT I know I've said this to you many times before, but non-uniformly scaled (squished/stretched) images look just plain bad. The bubbles should be round. The lack of uniform in your sigs is the only thing holding them back. Look at Rayman3DS's sig, all the bubbles are round giving it a much more professional look. But honestly, Rayman3DS is undoubtedly one of the best sig makers I've ever seen. He could make lots f money doing that sort of thing.
i forgot to scale the sig background to the rigt size and i was already done, so that was the reason,it's really better if you see the original, wait i gonna upload it
EDIT:
this actually wasn't even my original idea, i just maked for the fun that globox and i pretty like it, but the rest wasn't supper nice
That already does look a lot better. I'd probably just suggest a different design for a signature. It's like trying to turn a square into a rectangle while still calling it a square.
RayFan9876 wrote:
Anyway, Serza, can you make me an ROTD sig? I may use it in place of the title in my current sig then it will say 'Sig by Serza5!' just use whatever content you want from what I've posted to make something fancy... and make sure the title's in there.
Gonna work on this right now. Tis a shame you had no BGs without the text already but nyeh it's all cool.
Serza, would it be possible to make it one of those long, skinny sigs? Perhaps maybe half the height and 1.5 (pardon the pun) times as longw ith the logo on the left and a something crazy going to the right of it? I would use the current one but I don't want my sig too large and I don't want to lose any of the other text in it.
Serza, would it be possible to make it one of those long, skinny sigs? Perhaps maybe half the height and 1.5 (pardon the pun) times as longw ith the logo on the left and a something crazy going to the right of it? I would use the current one but I don't want my sig too large and I don't want to lose any of the other text in it.
Aye I could get round to it.
Might I ask if you'd be interested in having this in your sig : ?