I don't think you understood what he meant. He meant that the they could skip a number, implying that Origins is a "4." There was still a Halo 4 after Halo 3, that's not skipping a number.Shrooblord wrote:Not to bring the seemingly hated FPSes into this, but the Halo franchise works like this. It goes Halo Reach, Halo-future title Halo Anniversary, Halo 2, Halo 3-Halo 3 ODST, future title Halo 4 (H3 and ODST are simultaneous; Halo Anniversary is a remake of Halo 1). Because Reach is based earlier than Halo 1, but was made after Halo 3, they had to come up with another way to name it. They can't just call it Halo 0 - that would be weird.spiraldoor wrote:I imagine that calling the next game in the series ‘Rayman 5’ would make Origins’s status more clear, not less clear. It’s not unheard of for one sequel to drop the numbering system and another sequel to reinstate it in this way, though I can’t think of any examples at the moment.
I do wonder if Ancel plans on doing more Rayman. I'm sure he's not through with the character yet, but I'm unsure as to if he and his team will get enough ideas together to make another Rayman title. Hear us talking! Origins is just out, or round the corner for Europe and we're already talking about a next game.
Games like MW3 are considered fun because they attract the quick and shabby; those who don't have a large interest in video games but for some reason play all the time and call themselves "gamers."








